Civil and Human Rights

RELEASE: Abortion Ruling, While Welcome, In Reality Just “Supreme Court 101” 

WASHINGTON – On news that the U.S. Supreme Court issued its decision in June Medical Services L.L.C. v. Russo, with Chief Justice Roberts, as the fifth vote, ruling that stare decisis commanded that the Louisiana anti-abortion access law had to be overruled, CAC President Elizabeth Wydra issued the following statement:

Today’s ruling, while incredibly important, should not be surprising. In fact, this case should have been one of the easiest for the Court to dispose of this term. 

Just four years ago, the Court struck down a state statute virtually identical to the one at issue in this case, which unlawfully made it harder to access abortion clinics. The only thing that’s changed since that time is Justice Kavanaugh has replaced Justice Kennedy. Lower court judges in this case effectively ignored the Court’s ruling from just a few years ago, and it’s a shame that four other conservative Justices were willing to allow such brazen disregard of that earlier Supreme Court opinion.  

This was really just “Supreme Court 101” for all nine of the justices, but only five of them were prepared to show fidelity to law and precedent instead of politics, and not only strike down this Louisiana statute, but also send a message to lower courts to avoid pulling a stunt like this again.

#

Resources:

CAC brief in June Medical Services L.L.C. v. Russo: https://www.theusconstitution.org/litigation/june-medical-services-l-l-c-v-gee/ 

##

Constitutional Accountability Center is a think tank, public interest law firm, and action center dedicated to fulfilling the progressive promise of the Constitution’s text and history. Visit CAC’s website at www.theusconstitution.org.

###

More from Civil and Human Rights

Civil and Human Rights
June 20, 2024

RELEASE: Supreme Court decision keeps the door open to accountability for police officers who make false charges

WASHINGTON, DC – Following this morning’s decision at the Supreme Court in Chiaverini v. City...
By: Brian R. Frazelle
Civil and Human Rights
June 11, 2024

The People Who Dismantled Affirmative Action Have a New Strategy to Crush Racial Justice

Slate
Last summer, in Students for Fair Admissions v. Harvard College, the Supreme Court’s conservative supermajority struck...
By: David H. Gans
Civil and Human Rights
April 12, 2024

TV (Gray TV): CAC’s Frazelle Joins Gray TV to Discuss Fourth Amendment Case at Supreme Court

Gray TV Washington News Bureau
Civil and Human Rights
April 22, 2024

RELEASE: Justices grapple with line-drawing but resist overturning important precedent in Eighth Amendment homelessness case

WASHINGTON, DC – Following oral argument at the Supreme Court this morning in City of...
By: Brian R. Frazelle
Civil and Human Rights
April 19, 2024

Will the Supreme Court Uphold the 14th Amendment and Block an Oregon Law Criminalizing Homelessness?

Nearly 38 million Americans live in poverty. In some areas and among some populations, entrenched economic...
By: David H. Gans
Civil and Human Rights
April 18, 2024

DEI critics were hoping that the Supreme Court’s Muldrow decision would undermine corporate diversity programs. It does no such thing

Fortune
The Supreme Court just delivered a big win for workers and workplace equality–but conservatives are...