Civil and Human Rights

RELEASE: CAC Joins Broad Coalition Call For End to Qualified Immunity 

WASHINGTON – As Constitutional Accountability Center joins a broad ideological coalition—including the ACLU, Cato Institute, Protect Democracy, and Institute for Justice—calling on Congress to end qualified immunity and reform government employer liability, CAC President Elizabeth Wydra issued the following statement:

“Bipartisanship” seems to be the watchword of the Senate today, and this coalition of organizations spanning the ideological spectrum, standing together calling for an end to qualified immunity and a reform of government employer liability, helps show the broad extent of common ground on these critically important issues.

To the Senate I say, “We’ve shown by example that bipartisanship is possible by the assembly of this cross-ideological consensus. Now it’s your turn.  Let’s pass these much-needed reforms.”

#

Resources:

Coalition document calling on Congress to end qualified immunity and reform government employer liability, signed by the American Civil Liberties UnionAmnesty InternationalThe Black Police ExperienceThe Campaign to End Qualified ImmunityCato InstituteCivil Rights CorpsCenter for Disability RightsConstitutional Accountability CenterThe Daniel Initiative, Drug Policy AllianceThe Federal School Discipline and Climate GroupHuman Rights WatchInnocence ProjectInstitute for JusticeOpen Society Policy CenterProject on Government Oversight, and Protect Democracyhttps://www.theusconstitution.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/06/Organizations-Across-Ideological-Spectrum-Call-for-Government-Accountability-FINAL-FOR-DISTRIBUTION.pdf

##

Constitutional Accountability Center is a think tank, public interest law firm, and action center dedicated to fulfilling the progressive promise of the Constitution’s text and history. Visit CAC’s website at www.theusconstitution.org.

###

More from Civil and Human Rights

Civil and Human Rights
April 30, 2025

Debate over transgender rights grows more fraught in new Trump era

The Christian Science Monitor
Actions by the Trump administration have been pushing back on transgender inclusion, amid sharp public...
Civil and Human Rights
March 19, 2025

Viewpoint: The North Dakota Constitution’s protections include reproductive autonomy

North Dakota's Grand Forks Herald
The Court should live up to North Dakota’s history as a state with some of...
By: Nargis Aslami
Civil and Human Rights
February 27, 2025

What You Should Know About the Right to Protection in the Trump Era

Washington Monthly
The 14th Amendment was meant to enforce the laws equally, not put vulnerable populations in...
By: David H. Gans
Civil and Human Rights
U.S. District Court for the Western District of Washington

Shilling v. Trump

In Shilling v. Trump, the United States District Court for the Western District of Washington considered whether Trump’s Executive Order categorically barring transgender persons from serving in the military is unconstitutional.
Civil and Human Rights
February 19, 2025

History of the North Dakota Constitution Amicus Brief in Access Independent Health Services Inc., d/b/a Red River Women’s Clinic v. Wrigley

Center for Reproductive Rights
Amicus is the Constitutional Accountability Center, a think tank and public interest law firm dedicated...
Civil and Human Rights
U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia

Talbott v. Trump

In Talbott v. Trump, the United States District Court for the District of Columbia considered whether Trump’s Executive Order categorically barring transgender persons from serving in the military is unconstitutional.