Civil and Human Rights

RELEASE: CAC Supports the Abolition Amendment

WASHINGTON – Upon the introduction by Oregon U.S. Senator Jeff Merkley and Congresswoman Nikema Williams (GA-05) of a constitutional amendment—known as the Abolition Amendment—that would strike that part of the Thirteenth Amendment that allows slavery or involuntary servitude to continue in the United States “as a punishment for crime whereof the party shall have been duly convicted,” Constitutional Accountability Center President Elizabeth Wydra issued the following statement:

This effort to pass and ratify the Abolition Amendment joins a proud, centuries-long struggle to bend the arc of America’s Constitution further toward progress. The work started by Reconstruction is not finished. And by deciding we cannot allow any exception to the prohibition of slavery and involuntary servitude to persist in the Constitution, we stand on the shoulders of giants whose legacies call upon us today to make our union ever more perfect, more equal, more inclusive, and more free.

#

Resources:

“AHEAD OF JUNETEENTH, MERKLEY, WILLIAMS PROPOSE CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENT TO CLOSE SLAVERY LOOPHOLE IN 13TH AMENDMENT,” June 18, 2021: https://www.merkley.senate.gov/news/press-releases/ahead-of-juneteenth-merkley-williams-propose-constitutional-amendment-to-close-slavery-loophole-in-13th-amendment-2021

Amendment text as introduced in the 117th Congress: https://www.merkley.senate.gov/imo/media/doc/21.06.17%20Abolition%20Amendment.pdf

Summary explanation of the Abolition Amendment: https://www.merkley.senate.gov/imo/media/doc/The%20Abolition%20Amendment%20One%20Pager%20-%20117th_.pdf

##

Constitutional Accountability Center is a think tank, public interest law firm, and action center dedicated to fulfilling the progressive promise of the Constitution’s text and history. Visit CAC’s website at www.theusconstitution.org.

###

More from Civil and Human Rights

Civil and Human Rights
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Williams v. Huner

In Williams v. Huner, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit is considering whether a Pennsylvania prison’s failure to provide a prisoner with rigid neck and wrist braces and effective pain medication violated...
Civil and Human Rights
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Womble v. Patel

In Womble v. Patel, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit is considering whether a North Carolina prison’s failure to provide a prisoner with a hearing-aid battery violated the Americans with Disabilities Act.
Civil and Human Rights
U.S. Supreme Court

St. Mary Catholic Parish v. Roy

In St. Mary Catholic Parish v. Roy, the Supreme Court is considering whether the Free Exercise Clause requires Colorado to allow religious preschool providers to join its state-funded universal preschool program even though they refuse...
Civil and Human Rights
July 18, 2026

Arnie Arnesen Attitude July 16 2026

Attitude with Arnie Arnesen
CAC’s David H. Gans joined The Attitude with Arnie Arnesen to discuss the Reconstruction Amendments. Listen...
Civil and Human Rights
U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York

Wridt v. City of New York

In Wridt v. City of New York, the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York is considering whether the NYPD’s mass surveillance system is unconstitutional.
Civil and Human Rights
July 8, 2026

Ruling Away From America’s Second Founding

Slate
CAC’s David H. Gans wrote about the Roberts Court for Slate magazine. Read more in Slate.
By: David H. Gans