Civil and Human Rights

RELEASE: Court Ignores Republican Voices, Federalism, To Deal Blow to Public Sector Unions

Delivering this blow gave the lie to years of rhetoric about conservative concern for federalism and respect for state and local control. The Republican state and local officials we represent urged the Supreme Court’s conservative majority not to do this.

WASHINGTON—On news this morning that the U.S. Supreme Court issued its ruling in Janus v. American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees, Council 31, et al., ruling that states requiring union fair-share fees be paid to public sector unions who bargain on behalf of union and non-union workers alike is unconstitutional, Constitutional Accountability Center President Elizabeth Wydra issued the following reaction:

The Court’s conservative Justices have been on a mission for years to deal this blow to public sector unions. There is no split among the circuits to resolve. No urgency at all to take up case after case over recent Terms in an attempt to overrule its decades-old precedent allowing states to set their own rules on whether or not to require workers who aren’t union members—but who benefit from union bargaining—to pay their fair share to those unions.

Well, thanks to Mitch McConnell’s power grab and the confirmation of Justice Gorsuch, conservatives today finally did the deed.

Let’s not be fooled, however. Delivering this blow gave the lie to years of rhetoric about conservative concern for federalism and respect for state and local control. The Republican state and local officials we represent urged the Supreme Court’s conservative majority not to do this. Nothing in the Constitution requires today’s result. No other law requires it. Nonetheless, Justice Alito donned his robe—a paper-thin disguise for the ideology that drives his majority opinion today—and ignored the Constitution’s text, history, and values to reach the result he’s long wanted to reach.

Justice Kagan’s dissent captures the issue perfectly, saying “[T]he majority’s road runs long. And at every stop are black-robed rulers overriding citizens’ choices. The First Amendment was meant for better things. It was meant not to undermine but to protect democratic governance—including over the role of public-sector unions.”

Today’s ruling hurts, but American workers are powerful. I know that after absorbing the Court’s decision today, they will continue to fight as hard as ever for the power and equality they deserve.

#

Resources:

CAC brief on behalf of Republican state and local officials in Janus v. American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees, Council 31, et al.: https://www.theusconstitution.org/litigation/janus-v-american-federation-of-state-county-and-municipal-employees-council-31-et-al-u-s-sup-ct/

“Where are the Facts?” Brianne Gorod, Take Care, March 1, 2018: https://takecareblog.com/blog/where-are-the-facts

##

Now in our tenth year, Constitutional Accountability Center is a think tank, public interest law firm, and action center dedicated to fulfilling the progressive promise of the Constitution’s text and history. Visit the new CAC website at www.theusconstitution.org.

###

More from Civil and Human Rights

Civil and Human Rights
January 16, 2026

What’s Happening To Civil Rights Under ICE? w/ David Gans

Make It Make Sense with Grant Hermes
Grant talks to David Gans about what we’re seeing happen to civil rights and Constitutional...
Civil and Human Rights
January 19, 2026

On Martin Luther King Jr. Day, A Moment to Reflect on the Constitution

Washington Monthly
The Constitution is occasionally amended and continually interpreted, and it still offers hope for the...
By: Elizabeth B. Wydra
Civil and Human Rights
January 13, 2026

CAC Release: Supreme Court Hears Oral Argument in Cases Implicating Constitution’s Fundamental Guarantee of Equality for all Persons

WASHINGTON, DC – Following oral arguments at the Supreme Court this morning in Little v....
By: Joshua Blecher-Cohen, Praveen Fernandes, David H. Gans
Civil and Human Rights
December 5, 2025

Supreme Court Lets Stand a Two-Tiered System of Justice That Deprives Military Families of the Same Rights Afforded to Civilians

The Rutherford Institute
WASHINGTON, DC — In a ruling that leaves thousands of military servicemembers and their families...
Civil and Human Rights
November 20, 2025

Supreme Court Could Redefine the Limits of State Power

Newsweek
As the Supreme Court considers Chiles v. Salazar, a case examining Colorado’s 2019 ban on gay conversion therapy...
Civil and Human Rights
U.S. Supreme Court

Little v. Hecox and West Virginia v. B.P.J.

In Little v. Hecox and West Virginia v. B.P.J., the Supreme Court is considering whether laws in Idaho and West Virginia that prohibit all transgender women and girls from joining women’s and girls’ sports teams—across...