Access to Justice

RELEASE: Court Unanimously Rejects Atextual “Transportation Industry” Requirement for FAA Exemption, Allowing Truck Drivers Their Day in Court

WASHINGTON, DC – Following today’s decision at the Supreme Court in Bissonnette v. LePage Bakeries Park St., LLC, a case in which the Court considered whether the Federal Arbitration Act (FAA) exempts workers who are actively engaged in interstate transportation but are not employed by a company in the transportation “industry,” Constitutional Accountability Center Appellate Counsel Miriam Becker-Cohen issued the following reaction:

Today the Court unanimously rejected an attempt by a large corporation to contort the text of the FAA’s exemption for transportation workers to force more of its workers, who allege their rights have been violated, out of courtrooms and into arbitration proceedings. Echoing the straightforward textual analysis we presented in our amicus brief, the Court held that, as the Chief Justice put it, the exemption “says nothing to direct courts to consider the indus­try of a worker’s employer.” In other words, workers qualify as transportation workers based on the work they perform, not the industry for which they perform the work.

We are pleased that the Court recognized that the text of the FAA exemption, informed by the words’ original public meaning, dictates the outcome here. Indeed, as the Court noted, this approach to the FAA exemption is hardly new. The result here flowed directly from several of the Court’s previous cases, including Southwest Airlines v. Saxon, decided just a couple of years ago.

As a result of this case, the plaintiffs—truck drivers for a large baked goods corporation—will, at long last, get their day in court.

##

Resources:

Case page in Bissonnette v. LePage Bakeries Park St., LLC: https://www.theusconstitution.org/litigation/bissonnette-v-lepage-bakeries-park-st-llc/

Oral argument press release: Court Grapples Once Again with Federal Arbitration Act’s Exemption for Transportation Workers

##

Constitutional Accountability Center is a nonpartisan think tank and public interest law firm dedicated to fulfilling the progressive promise of the Constitution’s text, history, and values. Visit CAC’s website at www.theusconstitution.org.

##

More from Access to Justice

Access to Justice
U.S. Supreme Court

Beck v. United States

In Beck v. United States, the Supreme Court is considering whether servicemembers may sue the United States for money damages pursuant to the Federal Tort Claims Act when they are injured in the course of...
Access to Justice
March 19, 2025

Fight over False Claims Act whistleblower provision heats up on appeal

Reuters
At first glance, it might seem far-fetched to suggest a whistleblower law that’s been on...
Access to Justice
U.S. Supreme Court

Martin v. United States

In Martin v. United States, the Supreme Court is considering whether the Supremacy Clause overrides the Federal Tort Claims Act (FTCA)’s express waiver of sovereign immunity when a federal employee’s actions “have some nexus with...
Access to Justice
February 21, 2025

TV (Gray DC): CAC’s Becker-Cohen Joins Gray DC to Discuss Procedural Due Process Claim in Death Row Case

Gray DC
Access to Justice
February 24, 2025

RELEASE: As Justice Jackson Points Out, Seemingly Narrow Death-Penalty Case Would Have “Major Implications” for Standing Jurisprudence if Court Adopted Texas’s Argument

WASHINGTON, DC – Following oral argument at the Supreme Court this morning in Gutierrez v....
Access to Justice
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

United States ex rel. Zafirov v. Florida Medical Associates

In United States ex rel. Zafirov v. Florida Medical Associates, the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit is considering whether the qui tam provision of the False Claims Act violates the Appointments...