Civil and Human Rights

RELEASE: DACA at SCOTUS: A Tremendous Victory for Immigrant Youth and our Nation

WASHINGTON – On news that the U.S. Supreme Court issued its decision in Department of Homeland Security v. Regents of the University of California and consolidated cases — holding that the Trump Administration’s attempt to rescind the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals policy (DACA) violated the Administrative Procedure Act (APA) — Elizabeth Wydra, President of Constitutional Accountability Center, which filed a brief supporting DACA on behalf of current and bipartisan former Members of Congress, issued the following statement:

This is a tremendous victory.

The law requires our government to act with reason and transparency, but the Trump Administration’s attempt to end DACA was a democratic shambles on that score, with the lives of the DACA recipients held in the balance. The Court rightly concluded that the Trump Administration’s failure to consider the hardship that its policy would cause to hundreds of thousands of DACA recipients, who know this country as their only home, was unlawful, as was its failure to consider their reliance on DACA. As we know after almost four years, however, this Administration is a repeat offender when it comes to failing to consider fully the impact of its actions and be transparent about why it’s taking them.

#

Resources:

CAC brief in cases consolidated with Department of Homeland Security v. Regents of the University of California: https://www.theusconstitution.org/litigation/department-of-homeland-security-v-regents-of-the-university-of-california-trump-v-naacp-and-mcaleenan-v-vidal/

##

Constitutional Accountability Center is a think tank, public interest law firm, and action center dedicated to fulfilling the progressive promise of the Constitution’s text and history. Visit CAC’s website at www.theusconstitution.org. 

###

More from Civil and Human Rights

Civil and Human Rights
U.S. Supreme Court

St. Mary Catholic Parish v. Roy

In St. Mary Catholic Parish v. Roy, the Supreme Court is considering whether the Free Exercise Clause requires Colorado to allow religious preschool providers to join its state-funded universal preschool program even though they refuse...
Civil and Human Rights
July 18, 2026

Arnie Arnesen Attitude July 16 2026

Attitude with Arnie Arnesen
CAC’s David H. Gans joined The Attitude with Arnie Arnesen to discuss the Reconstruction Amendments. Listen...
Civil and Human Rights
U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York

Wridt v. City of New York

In Wridt v. City of New York, the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York is considering whether the NYPD’s mass surveillance system is unconstitutional.
Civil and Human Rights
July 8, 2026

Ruling Away From America’s Second Founding

Slate
CAC’s David H. Gans wrote about the Roberts Court for Slate magazine. Read more in Slate.
By: David H. Gans
Civil and Human Rights
July 1, 2026

Furthering Inclusive Constitutionalism

Jotwell
Professor Allison Brownell Tirres reviewed recent scholarship on the Black Conventions of Reconstruction by CAC’s David H....
Civil and Human Rights
June 30, 2026

CAC Release: Roberts Court’s Conservative Supermajority Hollows Out Equal Protection Guarantee

WASHINGTON, DC – Following today’s decision at the Supreme Court in Little v. Hecox and West Virginia...
By: David H. Gans, Praveen Fernandes, Joshua Blecher-Cohen