Civil and Human Rights

RELEASE: DACA at SCOTUS: A Tremendous Victory for Immigrant Youth and our Nation

WASHINGTON – On news that the U.S. Supreme Court issued its decision in Department of Homeland Security v. Regents of the University of California and consolidated cases — holding that the Trump Administration’s attempt to rescind the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals policy (DACA) violated the Administrative Procedure Act (APA) — Elizabeth Wydra, President of Constitutional Accountability Center, which filed a brief supporting DACA on behalf of current and bipartisan former Members of Congress, issued the following statement:

This is a tremendous victory.

The law requires our government to act with reason and transparency, but the Trump Administration’s attempt to end DACA was a democratic shambles on that score, with the lives of the DACA recipients held in the balance. The Court rightly concluded that the Trump Administration’s failure to consider the hardship that its policy would cause to hundreds of thousands of DACA recipients, who know this country as their only home, was unlawful, as was its failure to consider their reliance on DACA. As we know after almost four years, however, this Administration is a repeat offender when it comes to failing to consider fully the impact of its actions and be transparent about why it’s taking them.

#

Resources:

CAC brief in cases consolidated with Department of Homeland Security v. Regents of the University of California: https://www.theusconstitution.org/litigation/department-of-homeland-security-v-regents-of-the-university-of-california-trump-v-naacp-and-mcaleenan-v-vidal/

##

Constitutional Accountability Center is a think tank, public interest law firm, and action center dedicated to fulfilling the progressive promise of the Constitution’s text and history. Visit CAC’s website at www.theusconstitution.org. 

###

More from Civil and Human Rights

Civil and Human Rights
January 13, 2025

CAC RELEASE: At Stanley Oral Argument, Questioning Focuses on Narrow Ground for Resolving Employment Discrimination Case in Favor of a Retiree with a Disability

WASHINGTON, DC – Following oral argument at the Supreme Court this morning in Stanley v....
Civil and Human Rights
December 30, 2024

Top Contributor Essays of 2024

The Regulatory Review
The Regulatory Review is pleased to revisit our top regulatory essays of 2024, each authored by...
Civil and Human Rights
December 5, 2024

Podcast (We the People): Can Tennessee Ban Medical Transitions for Transgender Minors?

National Constitution Center
A Tennessee law prohibits transgender minors from receiving gender transition surgery and hormone therapy. Professor Kurt...
Civil and Human Rights
December 4, 2024

RELEASE: Supreme Court Should Not Turn Equal Protection Clause on its Head in Case about Medical Care for Transgender Adolescents

WASHINGTON, DC – Following oral argument at the Supreme Court this morning in United States...
Civil and Human Rights
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Payan v. Los Angeles Community College District

In Payan v. Los Angeles Community College District, the Ninth Circuit is considering whether lost educational opportunities are compensable under Title II of the Americans with Disabilities Act. 
Civil and Human Rights
U.S. Supreme Court

Stanley v. City of Sanford

In Stanley v. City of Sanford, the Supreme Court is considering whether the Americans with Disabilities Act protects against disability discrimination with respect to retirement benefits distributed after employment.