Health Care

RELEASE: Federal Appeals Court Allows OSHA Vaccinate-Or-Test Policy to Take Effect

WASHINGTON – On news of a ruling from the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit allowing the Occupational Safety and Health Administration’s national vaccinate-or-test policy for businesses with 100 or more employees to take effect, Constitutional Accountability Center Chief Counsel Brianne Gorod issued the following statement:

The OSHA vaccinate-or-test policy is a critically important tool for protecting American workers from the grave dangers of COVID-19, and the Sixth Circuit was plainly right to allow that policy to go into effect. As the Court rightly recognized, the question whether Congress’s delegation of authority to establish this policy is constitutional is not even a close one under Supreme Court precedent. And it’s not a close one when one looks at constitutional text and history, either. If, as is expected, the policy’s challengers next go to the Supreme Court, the Supreme Court should allow the policy—and the critically important protections that it provides to American workers—to remain in place. In a week when we learned the tragic fact that the pandemic has claimed 800,000 members of the American family, the stakes could not be clearer.



CAC case page in In Re: OSHA Rule on COVID-19 Vaccination and Testing:

RELEASE: CAC Tells Court: Dissolve Fifth Circuit Stay of Vaccinate-or-Test Policy, November 23, 2021:


Constitutional Accountability Center is a think tank, public interest law firm, and action center dedicated to fulfilling the progressive promise of the Constitution’s text and history. Visit CAC’s website at


More from Health Care

Health Care
May 30, 2024

Oklahoma to Ask Court to Unblock HHS Family Planning Money

Bloomberg Law
Oklahoma says HHS can’t require referral for illegal abortion Family planning grant loss expected to...
By: Miriam Becker-Cohen, Mary Anne Pazanowski
Health Care

Oklahoma v. United States Department of Health and Human Services

In Oklahoma v. United States Department of Health and Human Services, the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit is considering whether Title X reproductive healthcare clinics in Oklahoma can defy the federal...
Health Care
April 24, 2024

RELEASE: Justices Grapple with Scope and Effect of Conflict Between EMTALA and Idaho’s Near-Total Abortion Ban

WASHINGTON, DC – Following oral argument at the Supreme Court this morning in Idaho v....
By: Miriam Becker-Cohen
Health Care
March 29, 2024

Amicus Briefs Filed in Support of EMTALA, The Federal Right to Emergency Care, Including Abortion, in Idaho v. United States and Moyle v. United States

National Women's Law Center
A broad coalition of amici filed 27 briefs to the U.S. Supreme Court in support...
Health Care
U.S. Supreme Court

Idaho v. United States

In Idaho v. United States, the Supreme Court is considering whether EMTALA, a federal law requiring hospitals to provide stabilizing treatment to patients experiencing medical emergencies, preempts Idaho’s near-total abortion ban in situations where abortion...
Health Care
March 22, 2024

Supreme Court to rule on FDA approval of abortion drug mifepristone

Fox News
Call it wishful thinking or strategic amnesia, but just two years removed from its controversial...
By: Brianne J. Gorod, Shannon Bream, Bill Mears