Rule of Law

RELEASE: Flynn: Full D.C. Circuit Correctly Returns Case to District Court

WASHINGTON – On news that the full U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit issued its decision in In re: Michael T. Flynn, denying Flynn’s attempt to compel the District Court to grant the Department of Justice’s motion to dismiss criminal charges to which Flynn has already pleaded guilty, CAC President Elizabeth Wydra issued the following statement:

Today’s ruling against General Flynn, though expected, is certainly still welcome. The three-judge panel decision that was overruled by the full D.C. Circuit this morning would essentially have erased a vital check by the judiciary on the power of the executive branch. At the time of the panel’s decision, we called on the full D.C. Circuit to take up that ruling and reverse it, and we are grateful it did.

It bears repeating that the text and history of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure make clear that the U.S. District Court judge presiding over Flynn’s case is not simply a potted plant. He has a say in whether Attorney General Barr should be allowed to simply drop charges to which Flynn has already pleaded guilty, an act that would aid one of President Trump’s stalwart allies by essentially giving him a “get out of jail free” card. In fact, FRCP 48(a) was designed to prevent such corrupt or politically motivated dismissals that would harm the public interest. We are gratified that Flynn’s attempt to circumvent that rule was rejected today.

#

Resources:

CAC brief in United States v. Flynn, filed in D.C. District Court on behalf of criminal law professors: https://www.theusconstitution.org/litigation/united-states-v-flynn/ 

“What a 1924 case from Montana says about dismissing the Flynn prosecution,” Dayna Zolle, Washington Post, August 10, 2020: https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/2020/08/10/what-1924-case-montana-says-about-dismissing-flynn-prosecution/ 

CAC release: Appeals Court Deals Body Blow to Checks and Balances in Flynn Case (referring to three-judge panel ruling), June 24, 2020: https://www.theusconstitution.org/news/release-appeals-court-deals-body-blow-to-checks-and-balances-in-flynn-case/ 

##

Constitutional Accountability Center is a think tank, public interest law firm, and action center dedicated to fulfilling the progressive promise of the Constitution’s text and history. Visit CAC’s website at www.theusconstitution.org.

###

More from Rule of Law

Rule of Law
May 22, 2025

PODCAST NPR’s The Indicator from Planet Money: How Trump is making coin from $TRUMP coin

NPR
[audio mp3="https://www.theusconstitution.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/NPR7405315985.mp3"][/audio] Just before Trump began his second administration in January, he and his business...
Rule of Law
May 20, 2025

CAC Release: Attempts to Intimidate Public Officials Doing Their Jobs Should Concern All Americans

WASHINGTON, DC –  Upon press reports of the Trump Department of Justice’s decision to charge Congresswoman...
Rule of Law
May 16, 2025

CAC Release: At the D.C. Circuit, Everyone Agrees that the Constitution Does Not Permit the President to Unilaterally Shutter the CFPB

WASHINGTON, DC – Following oral argument at the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District...
Rule of Law
May 16, 2025

CAC Release: Skepticism About Trump Administration’s Power Grab at Labor Rights Agencies at D.C. Circuit Argument This Morning

WASHINGTON, DC – Following oral argument at the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District...
Rule of Law
U.S. District Court for the District of Maryland

J. Doe 4 v. Musk

In J. Doe 4 v. Musk, the United States District Court for the District of Maryland is considering whether Elon Musk’s role in DOGE violates the Appointments Clause and the Constitution’s separation of powers.
Rule of Law
May 9, 2025

Dodd-Frank Authors Join Warren, Waters to Challenge CFPB Firings

Bloomberg Law
Top Democrats, Dodd-Frank namesakes cite separation of powers Amicus brief highlights CFPB’s 2008 financial crisis...