Civil and Human Rights

RELEASE: JUSTICE Act Fails to Ensure Accountability

WASHINGTON – On introduction of the JUSTICE Act this morning, CAC President Elizabeth Wydra issued the following statement:

Earlier today, Senator Tim Scott and Senate Republican leadership introduced the JUSTICE Act, their purported response to the national and global outcry for true equality and systemic change in the wake of the killings of George Floyd, Breonna Taylor, and countless other African American men and women over generations at the hands of police. 

The path towards justice, however, begins with accountability, and this bill is entirely lacking on that score. The JUSTICE Act does not end qualified immunity, does not criminalize the reckless use of excessive force, and does not expand the authority to conduct pattern or practice investigations—all of which are necessary first steps to hold law enforcement accountable when they violate federally and constitutionally protected rights. 

The Constitutional Accountability Center continues to call on Congress to pass H.R. 7085, the Ending Qualified Immunity Act—introduced recently by Representatives Justin Amash (L-MI) and Ayanna Pressley (D-MA), and co-sponsored by members of both parties—which would ensure government accountability, encourage courts to play their historic role of redressing abuse of power, and create an incentive for governments to properly train, staff, and equip their departments.

#

Resources:

“CAC Endorses the Ending Qualified Immunity Act,” Statement of CAC President Elizabeth Wydra, June 5, 2020: https://www.theusconstitution.org/news/release-cac-endorses-the-ending-qualified-immunity-act/ 

##

Constitutional Accountability Center is a think tank, public interest law firm, and action center dedicated to fulfilling the progressive promise of the Constitution’s text and history. Visit CAC’s website at www.theusconstitution.org.

###

More from Civil and Human Rights

Civil and Human Rights
U.S. Supreme Court

Stanley v. City of Sanford

In Stanley v. City of Sanford, the Supreme Court is considering whether the Americans with Disabilities Act protects against disability discrimination with respect to retirement benefits distributed after employment. 
Civil and Human Rights
U.S. Supreme Court

United States v. Skrmetti

In United States v. Skrmetti, the Supreme Court is considering whether Tennessee’s ban on providing gender-affirming medical care to transgender adolescents violates the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment.
Civil and Human Rights
July 31, 2024

Supreme Court Allows Cities to Punish Homelessness

The Regulatory Review
At the end of its 2023-24 term, the U.S. Supreme Court issued several divided decisions...
By: Brian R. Frazelle
Civil and Human Rights
June 28, 2024

RELEASE: Ignoring constitutional history and original meaning, conservative majority allows city governments to punish people for sleeping in public even if they have nowhere else to go

WASHINGTON, DC – Following today’s decision at the Supreme Court in City of Grants Pass...
By: Brian R. Frazelle
Civil and Human Rights
June 20, 2024

RELEASE: Supreme Court decision keeps the door open to accountability for police officers who make false charges

WASHINGTON, DC – Following this morning’s decision at the Supreme Court in Chiaverini v. City...
By: Brian R. Frazelle
Civil and Human Rights
June 11, 2024

The People Who Dismantled Affirmative Action Have a New Strategy to Crush Racial Justice

Slate
Last summer, in Students for Fair Admissions v. Harvard College, the Supreme Court’s conservative supermajority struck...
By: David H. Gans