Rule of Law

RELEASE: Must the President Follow the Order of a Court? Conservative After Conservative Says ‘Yes’

President Trump cannot pick and choose which judicial orders to follow. In short, he is not above the law.

WASHINGTON—President Trump’s claim that he cannot obstruct justice because he is the President is the most recent example of Trump’s disregard for the rule of law. As President, he has repeatedly argued that his actions—such as his refusal to obey the Foreign and Domestic Emoluments Clauses and his Muslim travel ban—cannot be reviewed by the courts. He has bitterly attacked judges who have disagreed with him, maligning them as “so-called judge[s].” Under the Constitution, however, the President does not have a veto over court decisions he dislikes. Today Constitutional Accountability Center is releasing a thorough analysis, which shows that the Constitution’s text, history and values require the President to obey court judgments.

This latest Issue Brief, The President’s Duty To Obey Court Judgments, makes the case that the role of the courts in our constitutional system is to check government overreach, including by the President. Virtually everyone—left, right, and center—agrees that the President cannot disobey the courts. With a thorough analysis intended to head off any potential attempt by this President or his defenders to argue to the contrary, CAC Civil Rights Director David Gans writes (quoting Federalist Society co-founder Steven G. Calabresi):

If President Trump directed his subordinates to disobey a court order, he would be at war with the Constitution’s text, history, and most basic values. A system of government in which the President held an effective veto over court judgments “would be not so much a system of constitutional government as it would be a system of rule by an elected Napoleonic strongman.”

Gans surveys the broad ideological consensus around the position that U.S. Presidents are duty bound to obey the orders of a court, emphasizing the views of one conservative legal scholar after another who have helped solidify this consensus from the right. After this comprehensive survey, Gans concludes:

Whether one looks at the Constitution’s text and history, Supreme Court doctrine, scholarly writings, or the acts of our Presidents, it is clear that the President must obey judicial judgments. He cannot pick and choose which judicial orders to follow. In short, he is not above the law.

Read the full Issue Brief here: https://www.theusconstitution.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/06/Trump-Obey-Court-Judgments-Issue-Brief.pdf

##

Now in our tenth year, Constitutional Accountability Center is a think tank, public interest law firm, and action center dedicated to fulfilling the progressive promise of the Constitution’s text and history. Visit the new CAC website at www.theusconstitution.org.

###

More from Rule of Law

Rule of Law
May 20, 2025

CAC Release: Attempts to Intimidate Public Officials Doing Their Jobs Should Concern All Americans

WASHINGTON, DC –  Upon press reports of the Trump Department of Justice’s decision to charge Congresswoman...
Rule of Law
May 16, 2025

CAC Release: At the D.C. Circuit, Everyone Agrees that the Constitution Does Not Permit the President to Unilaterally Shutter the CFPB

WASHINGTON, DC – Following oral argument at the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District...
Rule of Law
May 16, 2025

CAC Release: Skepticism About Trump Administration’s Power Grab at Labor Rights Agencies at D.C. Circuit Argument This Morning

WASHINGTON, DC – Following oral argument at the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District...
Rule of Law
U.S. District Court for the District of Maryland

J. Doe 4 v. Musk

In J. Doe 4 v. Musk, the United States District Court for the District of Maryland is considering whether Elon Musk’s role in DOGE violates the Appointments Clause and the Constitution’s separation of powers.
Rule of Law
May 9, 2025

Dodd-Frank Authors Join Warren, Waters to Challenge CFPB Firings

Bloomberg Law
Top Democrats, Dodd-Frank namesakes cite separation of powers Amicus brief highlights CFPB’s 2008 financial crisis...
Rule of Law
U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit

National Treasury Employees Union v. Vought

In National Treasury Employees Union v. Vought, the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia is considering whether the Trump administration’s efforts to unilaterally shut down the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau are...