Civil and Human Rights

RELEASE: On the Police Killing of Breonna Taylor

WASHINGTON – Constitutional Accountability Center President Elizabeth Wydra issued the following statement:

Today would have been Breonna Taylor’s 27th birthday. 

Our Constitution prohibits the atrocious abuses she suffered at the hands of Louisville police. The Fourteenth Amendment was ratified, in part, to protect African Americans from arbitrary police violence. To help make this promise a reality, CAC has called for an end to “no knock” warrants, and the judge-made qualified immunity doctrine that insulates police from accountability. But these are just first steps. Achingly, Taylor’s death is more bitter evidence that the full promise of our Constitution has yet to be fulfilled.

Today, CAC reflects on the life of Breonna Taylor, and we rededicate ourselves to helping bend the arc of our Constitution’s progress closer to justice. May our Constitution’s majestic guarantees of freedom and equality soon be a reality, so that no other family in America has to bear the pain of such a terrible, indefensible loss.

#

Resources:

“CAC Statement on National Day of Mourning,” Elizabeth Wydra, June 4, 2020: https://www.theusconstitution.org/news/cac-statement-on-national-day-of-mourning/ 

“The Supreme Court Enabled Horrific Police Violence by Ignoring Constitutional History,” David H. Gans, Slate, June 3, 2020: https://slate.com/news-and-politics/2020/06/supreme-court-enabled-george-floyd-murder-police-violence.html

“Civil Rights Coalition Letter on Federal Policing Priorities,” Leadership Conference on Civil and Human Rights, June 1, 2020: https://civilrights.org/resource/civil-rights-coalition-letter-on-federal-policing-priorities/ 

“Here’s What You Need to Know About Breonna Taylor’s Death,” New York Times, May 30, 2020: https://www.nytimes.com/article/breonna-taylor-police.htm 

##

Constitutional Accountability Center is a think tank, public interest law firm, and action center dedicated to fulfilling the progressive promise of the Constitution’s text and history. Visit CAC’s website at www.theusconstitution.org.

###

More from Civil and Human Rights

Civil and Human Rights
May 24, 2025

Debate over transgender rights grows more fraught in new Trump era

The Christian Science Monitor
Actions by the Trump administration have been pushing back on transgender inclusion, amid sharp public...
Civil and Human Rights
March 19, 2025

Viewpoint: The North Dakota Constitution’s protections include reproductive autonomy

North Dakota's Grand Forks Herald
The Court should live up to North Dakota’s history as a state with some of...
By: Nargis Aslami
Civil and Human Rights
February 27, 2025

What You Should Know About the Right to Protection in the Trump Era

Washington Monthly
The 14th Amendment was meant to enforce the laws equally, not put vulnerable populations in...
By: David H. Gans
Civil and Human Rights
U.S. District Court for the Western District of Washington

Shilling v. Trump

In Shilling v. Trump, the United States District Court for the Western District of Washington considered whether Trump’s Executive Order categorically barring transgender persons from serving in the military is unconstitutional.
Civil and Human Rights
February 19, 2025

History of the North Dakota Constitution Amicus Brief in Access Independent Health Services Inc., d/b/a Red River Women’s Clinic v. Wrigley

Center for Reproductive Rights
Amicus is the Constitutional Accountability Center, a think tank and public interest law firm dedicated...
Civil and Human Rights
U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia

Talbott v. Trump

In Talbott v. Trump, the United States District Court for the District of Columbia considered whether Trump’s Executive Order categorically barring transgender persons from serving in the military is unconstitutional.