Civil and Human Rights

RELEASE: Supreme Court: Victory for Fourth Amendment in Caniglia

WASHINGTON – The Supreme Court this morning issued a ruling in Caniglia v. Strom, holding that the Fourth Amendment does not allow police to enter homes and conduct searches and seizures without a warrant under a generalized “community caretaking” rationale.

Constitutional Accountability Center President Elizabeth Wydra issued the following reaction:

Today’s opinion by Justice Thomas for a unanimous Court was spot-on. While the Court has allowed warrantless searches of vehicles in some situations under a “community caretaking” rationale, today’s opinion recognizes that “what is reasonable for vehicles is different from what is reasonable for homes.” The “caretaking” function that police officers are often called upon to perform is not “an open-ended license” to invade the privacy of the home.

These points echo the main arguments in our brief, namely that the Fourth Amendment’s framers provided broad protections against unbridled searches and seizures in large part to preserve the privacy and security of the home. The lower court’s ruling could not be squared with that text and founding history, and the Supreme Court today was right to issue this important correction.

#

Resources:

CAC’s case page in Caniglia v. Stromhttps://www.theusconstitution.org/litigation/caniglia-v-strom/

“In wake of Floyd, Taylor killings, should police have power to enter your home without a warrant?,” David Gans, USA Today, March 22, 2021: https://www.usatoday.com/story/opinion/policing/2021/03/22/should-police-have-power-enter-your-home-without-warrant-column/4714469001/

CAC Alert (VIDEO), Miriam Becker-Cohen, March 24, 2021: https://www.theusconstitution.org/blog/cac-alert-caniglia-v-strom/

RELEASE: Reaction to DOJ filing in Caniglia v. Strom, February 24, 2021: https://www.theusconstitution.org/news/release-reaction-to-doj-filing-in-caniglia-v-strom/

##

Constitutional Accountability Center is a think tank, public interest law firm, and action center dedicated to fulfilling the progressive promise of the Constitution’s text and history. Visit CAC’s website at www.theusconstitution.org.

###

More from Civil and Human Rights

Civil and Human Rights
January 16, 2026

What’s Happening To Civil Rights Under ICE? w/ David Gans

Make It Make Sense with Grant Hermes
Grant talks to David Gans about what we’re seeing happen to civil rights and Constitutional...
Civil and Human Rights
January 19, 2026

On Martin Luther King Jr. Day, A Moment to Reflect on the Constitution

Washington Monthly
The Constitution is occasionally amended and continually interpreted, and it still offers hope for the...
By: Elizabeth B. Wydra
Civil and Human Rights
January 13, 2026

CAC Release: Supreme Court Hears Oral Argument in Cases Implicating Constitution’s Fundamental Guarantee of Equality for all Persons

WASHINGTON, DC – Following oral arguments at the Supreme Court this morning in Little v....
By: Joshua Blecher-Cohen, Praveen Fernandes, David H. Gans
Civil and Human Rights
December 5, 2025

Supreme Court Lets Stand a Two-Tiered System of Justice That Deprives Military Families of the Same Rights Afforded to Civilians

The Rutherford Institute
WASHINGTON, DC — In a ruling that leaves thousands of military servicemembers and their families...
Civil and Human Rights
November 20, 2025

Supreme Court Could Redefine the Limits of State Power

Newsweek
As the Supreme Court considers Chiles v. Salazar, a case examining Colorado’s 2019 ban on gay conversion therapy...
Civil and Human Rights
U.S. Supreme Court

Little v. Hecox and West Virginia v. B.P.J.

In Little v. Hecox and West Virginia v. B.P.J., the Supreme Court is considering whether laws in Idaho and West Virginia that prohibit all transgender women and girls from joining women’s and girls’ sports teams—across...