Civil and Human Rights

RELEASE: Victory For The Constitution: Eighth Amendment’s Excessive Fines Protections Apply to States

“Today marks a milestone in the 228-year history of the Bill of Rights.” — CAC Chief Counsel Brianne Gorod

WASHINGTON – On news this morning that the U.S. Supreme Court held that the protections of the Eighth Amendment’s Excessive Fines Clause apply to the states, Constitutional Accountability Center Chief Counsel Brianne Gorod issued the following statement:

Today marks a milestone in the 228-year history of the Bill of Rights. As should have been the case since the Fourteenth Amendment was ratified in 1868, the Eighth Amendment’s prohibition on the imposition of excessive fines now applies to state governments no less than it does to the federal government.

Justice Ginsburg’s masterful opinion for the Court echoes key sections of our brief in recounting the history leading to the drafting of the Fourteenth Amendment—including the racist Black Codes that used draconian fines to punish and subjugate African Americans for petty crimes—and explains why the Constitution prohibits the states from meting out the kind of penalty borne by Tyson Timbs.

Significantly, this case has united progressives and conservatives—both advocates and the Justices themselves—in a shared understanding of the original meaning of the Constitution.

#

Resources:

CAC brief in support of petitioners in Timbs v. Indiana: https://www.theusconstitution.org/litigation/timbs-v-indiana/

CAC cert-stage brief in support of petitioners in Timbs v. Indianahttps://www.theusconstitution.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/03/Timbs-CAC-Brief.pdf

##

Constitutional Accountability Center is a think tank, public interest law firm, and action center dedicated to fulfilling the progressive promise of the Constitution’s text and history. Visit the new CAC website at www.theusconstitution.org.

###

More from Civil and Human Rights

Civil and Human Rights
October 28, 2021

Abortion Rights What’s at Stake

This #SCOTUS term abortion rights are on the docket. Watch CAC President Elizabeth Wydra and...
By: Elizabeth B. Wydra, Monica Simpson
Civil and Human Rights
October 19, 2021

Scholars, medical groups and former prosecutors file Supreme Court briefs against Texas abortion law

Dallas Morning News
WASHINGTON — Filings continued rolling in Tuesday ahead of Thursday’s U.S. Supreme Court deadline for...
Civil and Human Rights
October 12, 2021

OP-ED: The Mississippi Abortion Case Threatens the Right to Use Birth Control, Marry, and Even Make Choices About Sex

Slate
The constitutional right to abortion is under concerted attack by a deeply conservative Supreme Court....
By: David H. Gans
Civil and Human Rights
October 14, 2021

RELEASE: Texas Abortion Ban Likely Headed to Supreme Court 

WASHINGTON – Following a decision by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit...
By: Elizabeth B. Wydra
Civil and Human Rights
U.S. Supreme Court

United States v. Texas (S.B. 8 litigation)

In United States v. Texas, the Supreme Court is considering whether the federal government can sue Texas to enjoin a law that infringes on the constitutional right to a pre-viability abortion.
Civil and Human Rights
U.S. Supreme Court

Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization

In Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization, the Supreme Court is considering the constitutionality of Mississippi’s ban on abortions after fifteen weeks of pregnancy.