Civil and Human Rights

Second Founders

At a time when this ideology that calls itself “constitutional conservatism” demands that we all confine our imaginations of how American government should function to the Founders’ intentions (with a little retroactive Christian Nationalism minus the entrenchment of slavery), it’s important to remember that in response to the trauma of the Civil War, there was a “second founding” encompassed by the Civil War amendments and the effort towards Reconstruction that really must be understood as well.

At a time when this ideology that calls itself “constitutional conservatism” demands that we all confine our imaginations of how American government should function to the Founders’ intentions (with a little retroactive Christian Nationalism minus the entrenchment of slavery), it’s important to remember that in response to the trauma of the Civil War, there was a “second founding” encompassed by the Civil War amendments and the effort towards Reconstruction that really must be understood as well.

With perfect timing, Jeffery Rosen of the National Constitutional Center and Tom Donnelly of the Constitutional Accountability Center are announcing a Second Founding Initiative that will undertake a five-year discussion to commemorate the 150th anniversaries of the key moments of those crucial years.

While the American people rightly revere George Washington, James Madison, and their fellow Framers, it took the heroic efforts of Lincoln, Stevens, Frederick Douglass, John Bingham (the framer of the Fourteenth Amendment), and many others to create the “more perfect Union” built on winning a bloody Civil War and ratifying a series of amendments that ended slavery, protected fundamental rights from state abuses, guaranteed equality for all, and expanded the right to vote. While the 1787 Framers succeeded in creating the most durable form of government in history, it’s only after the Second Founding that the Constitution fully protected the liberty and equality promised in the Declaration of Independence….

In light of the Second Founding turning 150, the time is ripe for a national conversation about its enduring meaning and continuing importance. Of course, few Americans have likely thought about this period (or its leaders) since their high school history classes—and, even then, they are as likely to remember Reconstruction as a period of Northern vengeance and national disappointment as they are a precursor to Brown v. Board of Education, King, and the achievements of the civil-rights movement….

Over the next five years, the National Constitution Center and Constitutional Accountability Center will work together on the Second Founding Initiative, with an advisory board chaired by Justice Sandra Day O’Connor. The bi-partisan initiative is committed to bringing together scholars, thought leaders, and citizens from diverse philosophical and legal perspectives to commemorate and debate the meaning of the Second Founding, the original understanding of the Reconstruction Amendments, and their contemporary significance.

This couldn’t come a moment too soon. Many of us were shocked and delighted when a conservative presidential candidate offered a shout-out to the Fourteenth Amendment as an important Republican accomplishment back in July. But Rick Perry has since dropped out of the race, and the constitutional conservatives who have a tendency to wish away all the unpleasantness of the 1860s (except, of course, when they are looking for an alleged precedent for the movement to recriminalize abortion) are again riding high. Remembering the Second Founders and their determination to keep America from perpetually being a stunted and internally riven eighteenth century agrarian slave-owning oligarchy is an urgent educational—and political—undertaking.

More from Civil and Human Rights

Civil and Human Rights
May 19, 2025

Debate over transgender rights grows more fraught in new Trump era

The Christian Science Monitor
Actions by the Trump administration have been pushing back on transgender inclusion, amid sharp public...
Civil and Human Rights
March 19, 2025

Viewpoint: The North Dakota Constitution’s protections include reproductive autonomy

North Dakota's Grand Forks Herald
The Court should live up to North Dakota’s history as a state with some of...
By: Nargis Aslami
Civil and Human Rights
February 27, 2025

What You Should Know About the Right to Protection in the Trump Era

Washington Monthly
The 14th Amendment was meant to enforce the laws equally, not put vulnerable populations in...
By: David H. Gans
Civil and Human Rights
U.S. District Court for the Western District of Washington

Shilling v. Trump

In Shilling v. Trump, the United States District Court for the Western District of Washington considered whether Trump’s Executive Order categorically barring transgender persons from serving in the military is unconstitutional.
Civil and Human Rights
February 19, 2025

History of the North Dakota Constitution Amicus Brief in Access Independent Health Services Inc., d/b/a Red River Women’s Clinic v. Wrigley

Center for Reproductive Rights
Amicus is the Constitutional Accountability Center, a think tank and public interest law firm dedicated...
Civil and Human Rights
U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia

Talbott v. Trump

In Talbott v. Trump, the United States District Court for the District of Columbia considered whether Trump’s Executive Order categorically barring transgender persons from serving in the military is unconstitutional.