Civil and Human Rights

Supreme Court Rejects Obamacare Challenge Brought By Anti-Gay Crusader

Dr. Steven Hotze’s case was backed by Sen. Ted Cruz

By Robert Baldwin III

WASHINGTON — The Supreme Court has declined to hear a challenge to the Affordable Care Act brought by an anti-gay Houston physician who has warned that same-sex marriage will lead to sodomy among kindergarteners.

The court, in a single-line order Monday, rejected the case brought by Dr. Steven Hotze without explanation. Hotze’s lawsuit alleged that Obamacare failed to comply with the Constitution’s origination clause, which provides that all taxes must originate in the House of Representatives.

The court in January declined to hear a similar origination clause case brought by a Sacramento plaintiff. The challenges arise from the Supreme Court’s ruling in 2012 that the Affordable Care Act imposed a tax on citizens without health insurance, thus making the law’s origin in Congress subject to review by the courts.

“There is universal agreement among the judges who have heard these cases, both conservative and liberal judges, that the case is a loser,” said Elizabeth Wydra, president of the liberal-leaning Constitutional Accountability Center during testimony before the House Judiciary Committee in January.

Hotze’s failed challenge stands out because it was backed by Sen. Ted Cruz (R-Texas). The GOP presidential candidate signed onto an amicus brief in support of Hotze in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 5th Circuit in July.

Hotze, despite his anti-gay views, has a long history of associating with politicians. Cruz spoke at an anti-gay marriage rally Hotze hosted in 2014. Hotze was a supporter of former Houston Mayor Louie Welch, who famously said, “Shoot the queers,” when asked how he would curb HIV in his unsuccessful 1985 comeback campaign.

Hotze said when he founded the political action committee Conservative Republicans of Texas in July that if marriage is redefined, “It will be mandated to be taught to the children in the schools, at an early age, starting in kindergarten. They will be encouraged by their teachers to participate in anal sex.” 

The Supreme Court later this month is scheduled to hear arguments in Zubik v. Burwell, sort of sequel to 2014’s Hobby Lobby case that tests whether Obamacare’s requirement that religious organizations sign a form to opt out of providing their employees with contraceptive coverage violates their beliefs.

More from Civil and Human Rights

Civil and Human Rights
June 28, 2024

RELEASE: Ignoring constitutional history and original meaning, conservative majority allows city governments to punish people for sleeping in public even if they have nowhere else to go

WASHINGTON, DC – Following today’s decision at the Supreme Court in City of Grants Pass...
By: Brian R. Frazelle
Civil and Human Rights
June 20, 2024

RELEASE: Supreme Court decision keeps the door open to accountability for police officers who make false charges

WASHINGTON, DC – Following this morning’s decision at the Supreme Court in Chiaverini v. City...
By: Brian R. Frazelle
Civil and Human Rights
June 11, 2024

The People Who Dismantled Affirmative Action Have a New Strategy to Crush Racial Justice

Slate
Last summer, in Students for Fair Admissions v. Harvard College, the Supreme Court’s conservative supermajority struck...
By: David H. Gans
Civil and Human Rights
April 12, 2024

TV (Gray TV): CAC’s Frazelle Joins Gray TV to Discuss Fourth Amendment Case at Supreme Court

Gray TV Washington News Bureau
Civil and Human Rights
April 22, 2024

RELEASE: Justices grapple with line-drawing but resist overturning important precedent in Eighth Amendment homelessness case

WASHINGTON, DC – Following oral argument at the Supreme Court this morning in City of...
By: Brian R. Frazelle
Civil and Human Rights
April 19, 2024

Will the Supreme Court Uphold the 14th Amendment and Block an Oregon Law Criminalizing Homelessness?

Nearly 38 million Americans live in poverty. In some areas and among some populations, entrenched economic...
By: David H. Gans