Civil and Human Rights

The Impact Of Supreme Court Decision On Florida’s Death Sentence

By Catherine Welch

The U.S. Supreme Court has ruled that Florida’s death penalty system is unconstitutional. The court ruled that Florida gave too much authority to judges.

 

The 8-1 decision said Florida’s system is flawed because juries can only recommend the death penalty while judges make the final decision.

 

Florida, Alabama and Delaware are the three states where a unanimous jury decision is not required. Brianne Gorod, appellate counsel with the Constitutional Accountability Center, said the Florida ruling puts other states on notice. 

 

“I think this decision will put any other states that might be tempted to leaving capital sentences to judges, that that’s not okay under our constitution,” said Gorod.

 

The Supreme Court ruling could trigger appeals from some of the 390 Florida inmates on death row. Florida State University legal scholar Mark Schlackman said it’s going to take a while to unravel the impact for people currently on Death Row, and whether it applies to just one case.

 

“There will be those who argue that it applies to Florida’s entire death row. And some will say cases that are similarly situated it would make sense it would apply to them,” said Schlackman. “So these issues have to be clarified.”

 

Statehouse leaders reacted to the ruling saying lawmakers will move quickly to overhaul the state’s death penalty system.

More from Civil and Human Rights

Civil and Human Rights
January 16, 2026

What’s Happening To Civil Rights Under ICE? w/ David Gans

Make It Make Sense with Grant Hermes
Grant talks to David Gans about what we’re seeing happen to civil rights and Constitutional...
Civil and Human Rights
January 19, 2026

On Martin Luther King Jr. Day, A Moment to Reflect on the Constitution

Washington Monthly
The Constitution is occasionally amended and continually interpreted, and it still offers hope for the...
By: Elizabeth B. Wydra
Civil and Human Rights
January 13, 2026

CAC Release: Supreme Court Hears Oral Argument in Cases Implicating Constitution’s Fundamental Guarantee of Equality for all Persons

WASHINGTON, DC – Following oral arguments at the Supreme Court this morning in Little v....
By: Joshua Blecher-Cohen, Praveen Fernandes, David H. Gans
Civil and Human Rights
December 5, 2025

Supreme Court Lets Stand a Two-Tiered System of Justice That Deprives Military Families of the Same Rights Afforded to Civilians

The Rutherford Institute
WASHINGTON, DC — In a ruling that leaves thousands of military servicemembers and their families...
Civil and Human Rights
November 20, 2025

Supreme Court Could Redefine the Limits of State Power

Newsweek
As the Supreme Court considers Chiles v. Salazar, a case examining Colorado’s 2019 ban on gay conversion therapy...
Civil and Human Rights
U.S. Supreme Court

Little v. Hecox and West Virginia v. B.P.J.

In Little v. Hecox and West Virginia v. B.P.J., the Supreme Court is considering whether laws in Idaho and West Virginia that prohibit all transgender women and girls from joining women’s and girls’ sports teams—across...