Voting Rights and Democracy

TV (Nexstar): Supreme Court Decides to Hear Wisconsin Case on Partisan Gerrymandering

By Brie Jackson

The U.S. Supreme Court decided Monday to hear a Wisconsin case about partisan gerrymandering.

Experts say the outcome could change the way elections are conducted.

The issue at hand is whether election maps favoring one political party violates the constitution.
The Supreme Court agreed to hear a case that will decide if it is constitutional to draw election maps that clearly favor one political party.

David Gans, civil rights director for the Constitutional Accountability Center, says one question at hand is: do voters choose their elected representatives or is it the other way around?
“This is a huge deal. This case tees up a huge constitutional dispute about whether the Constitution limits partisan gerrymandering,” Gans said.
In this case justices could draw clear limits between a legislator going too far in pursing partisan ends.
“The essential point is that in our constitutional system voters should choose their elected representatives. It shouldn’t be in the power of a legislator to manipulate lines,” Gans said.
In the past, we’ve seen the Supreme Court toss out electoral maps for suppressing minority votes. But never before have the justices found a plan unconstitutional based on partisan gerrymandering. What may become a landmark case could come down to a key vote.
The Wsconsin case will be heard by the Supreme Court this fall.

A group of Misourians have formed a petition to address gerrymandering and a number of other issues.

It’s called the Clean Missouri Intiative.

According to the petition circulating online, it calls for an end to nearly all lobbyist gifts and requires all legislative records to become public.

It would lower the amount of legally acceptable campaign contributions.

It would also appoint a citizen commission to review political maps, in an effort to end gerrymandering.

More from Voting Rights and Democracy

Voting Rights and Democracy
May 24, 2024

Voting Rights Experts Find Old Ideas in New Racial Gerrymandering Standard

Courthouse News Service
WASHINGTON (CN) — Seven years ago, Justice Samuel Alito lamented his colleagues' refusal to create...
By: David H. Gans, Kelsey Reichmann
Voting Rights and Democracy
May 24, 2024

This Supreme Court Term Was All About Undoing Democracy

Mother Jones
In the coming weeks, the Supreme Court will wrap up a consequential term and issue decisions...
By: David H. Gans, Miriam Becker-Cohen, Pema Levy
Voting Rights and Democracy
May 23, 2024

RELEASE: Supreme Court’s Conservative Majority Upholds Racial Gerrymander and Strikes a Severe Blow to Our Constitution’s Promise of a Multiracial Democracy

WASHINGTON, DC – Following today’s decision at the Supreme Court in Alexander v. The South...
By: David H. Gans
Voting Rights and Democracy
May 13, 2024

Constitutional questions for Voting Rights Act abound in Louisiana map fight

Courthouse News Service
After a yearslong fight to keep a map found to have diluted the power of...
By: David H. Gans, Kelsey Reichmann
Voting Rights and Democracy
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

Alpha Phi Alpha Fraternity, Inc. v. Secretary, State of Georgia

In Alpha Phi Alpha Fraternity, Inc. v. Secretary, State of Georgia and two consolidated cases, the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit is considering whether the Voting Rights Act’s prohibition on vote...
Voting Rights and Democracy
March 26, 2024

The Airtight Case Against Texas’ Mail-In Voting Age Requirements

In Texas and a number of other states, voters age 65 and older have the...
By: David H. Gans