Civil and Human Rights

US Supreme Court readies historic rulings

By Chantal Valery (AFP)   

 

WASHINGTON — The US Supreme Court is preparing to hand down one of the most significant sequences of judgments in US history, with upcoming rulings expected to have far-reaching consequences for millions of Americans.

 

The nine-justice panel must issue opinions on outstanding cases it has heard in fall and winter sessions by the end of June.

 

They are set to rule on cases involving hot button issues such as gay marriage, equal opportunities in education and voter rights for minorities.

 

The first of the keenly awaited opinions could be released as early as Monday, with analysts tipping the possibility of a resolution to a case revolving around the affirmative action admissions policy of the University of Texas at Austin.

 

An undergraduate student, Abigail Fisher has challenged the college’s decision to deny her admission because of racial quotas.

 

Fisher argued that she had effectively been discriminated against because she was white, in violation of equal protection rules enshrined in the US Constitution.

 

A separate case also seeks to address another crucial pillar of the civil rights struggle, looking into whether federal laws protecting minority voting rights were still warranted.

 

In the most high-profile case, justices will rule on the legality of same-sex marriage following landmark oral hearings in March.

 

Elizabeth Wydra, a lawyer at the Constitutional Accountability Center, said the upcoming rulings might even outweigh last year’s arguments on health care.

 

“Everyone thought that last term was the term of the century because of the health care arguments,” Wydra told AFP.

 

“But this term might be even more historic because the Court is considering the constitutionality of the Voting Rights Act, one of America’s most iconic civil rights laws, the constitutionality of providing for equal opportunity in higher education in the affirmative action case, and a fundamental question of equality in the same-sex marriage cases.

 

“It’s a very important term for millions of Americans who want to enjoy their constitutional right to equality.”

 

Wydra said attempting to predict which way the court would lean in its opinions was fraught with difficulty, believing that the views of Justice Anthony Kennedy, who has often held the swing vote on close decisions in the past, may again be key.

 

The Supreme Court justices are supposed to be independent, but five of them were selected by Republican presidents and are mostly conservative, while four picked by Democrats and tend to be liberal. Kennedy, appointed by Republican Ronald Reagan in 1988, is often the swing vote.

 

“This term, in particular, it’s very risky to bet on what the Supreme Court will do,” Wydra said. “This will be again a term where Justice Kennedy’s vote in many cases could be the deciding factor.”

 

“It’s very likely that Justice Kennedy will write the opinion and could very well be the decisive vote in the affirmative action case.”

 

Meanwhile Elise Boddie, the litigation director of the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People Legal Defense Fund, said the opinions on the two civil rights cases before the justices — on affirmative action programs in college and minority voting rights — would have a massive sociological impact.

 

“The cases are enormously important because ultimately the issues that are at stake are protecting opportunities in higher education for African-Americans and protecting the opportunity to participate in our democracy, tremendously important issues that will affect the landscape of opportunity and inclusion in the country,” Boddie said.

 

“We’ll be watching every Justice in these cases to see how they vote. We are optimistic about these cases, because we think that at the end of the day the justices will recognize the importance of opportunities in high education and that no door should be closed to under-represented groups.”

More from Civil and Human Rights

Civil and Human Rights
April 29, 2025

Debate over transgender rights grows more fraught in new Trump era

The Christian Science Monitor
Actions by the Trump administration have been pushing back on transgender inclusion, amid sharp public...
Civil and Human Rights
March 19, 2025

Viewpoint: The North Dakota Constitution’s protections include reproductive autonomy

North Dakota's Grand Forks Herald
The Court should live up to North Dakota’s history as a state with some of...
By: Nargis Aslami
Civil and Human Rights
February 27, 2025

What You Should Know About the Right to Protection in the Trump Era

Washington Monthly
The 14th Amendment was meant to enforce the laws equally, not put vulnerable populations in...
By: David H. Gans
Civil and Human Rights
U.S. District Court for the Western District of Washington

Shilling v. Trump

In Shilling v. Trump, the United States District Court for the Western District of Washington considered whether Trump’s Executive Order categorically barring transgender persons from serving in the military is unconstitutional.
Civil and Human Rights
February 19, 2025

History of the North Dakota Constitution Amicus Brief in Access Independent Health Services Inc., d/b/a Red River Women’s Clinic v. Wrigley

Center for Reproductive Rights
Amicus is the Constitutional Accountability Center, a think tank and public interest law firm dedicated...
Civil and Human Rights
U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia

Talbott v. Trump

In Talbott v. Trump, the United States District Court for the District of Columbia considered whether Trump’s Executive Order categorically barring transgender persons from serving in the military is unconstitutional.