Civil and Human Rights

With Major Rulings Pending, Supreme Court Enters Homestretch

By Marcia Coyle

 

…Elizabeth Wydra, chief counsel of the Constitutional Accountability Center, said she will look at Hobby Lobby “to see how the court deals with the threshold question of whether secular corporations can bring a claim of religious free exercise, a constitutional right that the Court has never before interpreted to include for-profit commercial corporations.”

 

The decision, Wydra added, could follow in the footsteps of Citizens United, “in which the Roberts Court reads the First Amendment in a new way to give corporations constitutional rights that only individuals had previously been thought to enjoy.”

 

Wydra said she also will watch whether an alliance of liberal and libertarian justices will come together in the cell phone cases to protect their owners’ Fourth Amendment rights. She noted that just such an alliance emerged in amicus briefs supporting the individuals whose phones were searched. That ideological crossover, she said, seemed to be reflected on the bench during oral arguments “as many of the justices appeared to struggle with the government’s argument excluding smartphones from the Fourth Amendment’s protections.”….

More from Civil and Human Rights

Civil and Human Rights
April 23, 2025

Debate over transgender rights grows more fraught in new Trump era

The Christian Science Monitor
Actions by the Trump administration have been pushing back on transgender inclusion, amid sharp public...
Civil and Human Rights
March 19, 2025

Viewpoint: The North Dakota Constitution’s protections include reproductive autonomy

North Dakota's Grand Forks Herald
The Court should live up to North Dakota’s history as a state with some of...
By: Nargis Aslami
Civil and Human Rights
February 27, 2025

What You Should Know About the Right to Protection in the Trump Era

Washington Monthly
The 14th Amendment was meant to enforce the laws equally, not put vulnerable populations in...
By: David H. Gans
Civil and Human Rights
U.S. District Court for the Western District of Washington

Shilling v. Trump

In Shilling v. Trump, the United States District Court for the Western District of Washington considered whether Trump’s Executive Order categorically barring transgender persons from serving in the military is unconstitutional.
Civil and Human Rights
February 19, 2025

History of the North Dakota Constitution Amicus Brief in Access Independent Health Services Inc., d/b/a Red River Women’s Clinic v. Wrigley

Center for Reproductive Rights
Amicus is the Constitutional Accountability Center, a think tank and public interest law firm dedicated...
Civil and Human Rights
U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia

Talbott v. Trump

In Talbott v. Trump, the United States District Court for the District of Columbia considered whether Trump’s Executive Order categorically barring transgender persons from serving in the military is unconstitutional.