Civil and Human Rights

Student Chapter of the Week December 7: University of Pennsylvania Law School

Details

Friday, December 7, 2012
17:00:00
American Constitution Society

The University of Pennsylvania Law School ACS Student Chapter, under the leadership of Faculty Advisor Professor Kermit Roosevelt, is wrapping up an exciting semester of driving progressive dialogue on important legal and constitutional issues.  The school year started with a bang, when the chapter hosted SCOTUSblog writer Kevin Russell, Akin Gump Supreme Court practice leader Patricia Millett, Vinson & Elkins partner John Elwood, and head of the ACLU Immigrants’ Rights Project Cecillia Wang for its annual Supreme Court Review and Preview, moderated by Professor Seth Kreimer.  The chapter also packed a lecture hall to capacity to hear ACS board member Professor Linda Greenhouse, Professor Amy Wax, and David Gans of the Constitutional Accountability Center preview the arguments in this term’s significant affirmative action case, Fisher v. University of Texas.  Taking advantage of interest in the upcoming election and a hot-button issue in Pennsylvania, the chapter worked with other groups on campus to co-sponsor a discussion with the lawyers that led a suit successfully challenging the state’s restrictive voter ID law. 

Penn Law ACS also emphasized connecting students to progressive leaders and academics through a series of professor dinners and brownbag lunches.  These brownbag lunches included a conversation about progressive lawyering in private practice with ACS board member Stephen Susman and a roundtable on the implications of the November elections with Professor Sophia Lee.  The chapter also worked to increase its national membership by hosting a quizzo night for new and returning members, which helped the chapter win the November 2012 Student Membership Contest.

The Penn Law Chapter is already looking ahead to next semester, when it will host its Tenth Annual Federal Judges Panel and help coordinate the Constance Baker Motley National Student Writing Competition.

More from Civil and Human Rights

Civil and Human Rights
May 14, 2025

Debate over transgender rights grows more fraught in new Trump era

The Christian Science Monitor
Actions by the Trump administration have been pushing back on transgender inclusion, amid sharp public...
Civil and Human Rights
March 19, 2025

Viewpoint: The North Dakota Constitution’s protections include reproductive autonomy

North Dakota's Grand Forks Herald
The Court should live up to North Dakota’s history as a state with some of...
By: Nargis Aslami
Civil and Human Rights
February 27, 2025

What You Should Know About the Right to Protection in the Trump Era

Washington Monthly
The 14th Amendment was meant to enforce the laws equally, not put vulnerable populations in...
By: David H. Gans
Civil and Human Rights
U.S. District Court for the Western District of Washington

Shilling v. Trump

In Shilling v. Trump, the United States District Court for the Western District of Washington considered whether Trump’s Executive Order categorically barring transgender persons from serving in the military is unconstitutional.
Civil and Human Rights
February 19, 2025

History of the North Dakota Constitution Amicus Brief in Access Independent Health Services Inc., d/b/a Red River Women’s Clinic v. Wrigley

Center for Reproductive Rights
Amicus is the Constitutional Accountability Center, a think tank and public interest law firm dedicated...
Civil and Human Rights
U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia

Talbott v. Trump

In Talbott v. Trump, the United States District Court for the District of Columbia considered whether Trump’s Executive Order categorically barring transgender persons from serving in the military is unconstitutional.