Environmental Justice

Stop the Beach Renourishment v. Florida Department of Environmental Protection, et al.

Stop the Beach Renourishment v. Florida Department of Environmental Protection is a “judicial takings” case that involves beach restoration and renourishment.

Case Summary

With sea level rise and hurricanes, beaches around the country are eroding rapidly and a number of states have invested heavily in programs to maintain their beaches. Under Florida’s program, the state will agree to rebuild a highly eroded beach area and then maintain the beach to a fixed boundary called the erosion control line. The effect is to change the property boundary between the state land and private property from a variable mean high tide mark to a fixed erosion control line. The landowners challenged this change in property boundaries as a violation of state law in the Florida court system and lost; they sought federal Supreme Court review on the theory that, in denying their state law claims, the Florida Supreme Court so distorted Florida law that the court ruling amounted to a “judicial takings,” a species of takings claim that the U.S. Supreme Court has hinted at, but never officially recognized.

Constitutional Accountability Center (CAC) and the State and Local Legal Center filed a brief in the case on behalf of state and local government organizations, urging the Supreme Court not to create a new doctrine of “judicial takings” because it is unnecessary, impractical, and violates bedrock principles of federalism.

On June 17, 2010, the Supreme Court delivered a unanimous decision in support of Florida’s beach restoration efforts. Read CAC’s press release about the ruling here.

Read more about the case at Text & History.

Case Timeline

More from Environmental Justice

Environmental Justice
November 20, 2018

States, Dem Legislators Back Monument Suits Against Trump

Law360
Democratic lawmakers and several states urged a D.C. federal court Monday to hear out challenges...
Environmental Justice
November 20, 2018

RELEASE: Members of Congress to Court: President Trump Can’t Cut National Monuments

CAC President Elizabeth Wydra: “Just because President Trump is willing to do whatever his mining supporters...
By: Elizabeth B. Wydra
Environmental Justice
U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia

Hopi Tribe v. Trump; Wilderness Society v. Trump

In Hopi Tribe v. Trump and Wilderness Society v. Trump, the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia is considering whether President Trump has the authority to reduce the size of national monuments unilaterally,...
Environmental Justice
November 30, 2016

The Battle for Climate Change Accountability

Host: American Constitution Society & Center for American Progress
CAC President Elizabeth Wydra joined scholars, litigators, journalists and former public officials to discuss the...
Participants: Elizabeth B. Wydra
Environmental Justice
November 13, 2016

D.C. Circuit may be bulwark against enviro rule changes

E&E Publishing
By Amanda Reilly A panel of judges in Washington, D.C., that leans liberal could give...
Environmental Justice
November 4, 2016

Supreme Court to weigh arguments over ‘acting’ officials

E&E Publishing
By Amanda Reilly The Supreme Court will hear arguments Monday over whether some nominees for...