Immigration and Citizenship

RELEASE: Appeals Court: Trump Muslim Travel Ban 2.0 Just As Unconstitutional As 1.0

Washington, DC – On news this afternoon that the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit handed down its ruling in International Refugee Assistance Project, et al. v. Trump, et al. – one of several lawsuits challenging President Trump’s revised Muslim travel ban – Constitutional Accountability Center issued the following reaction:

CAC Chief Counsel Brianne Gorod said, “Today’s ruling is an important reaffirmation that courts will review and check the unlawful acts of this Administration. The court saw through Trump’s smokescreen of neutrality in his revised Muslim travel ban and rightly concluded that it ‘drips with religious intolerance, animus, and discrimination.’ It is time for Trump and his team to comply with the Constitution.”

“The Trump Administration is not above the law,” added CAC President Elizabeth Wydra, “and that includes the values of religious tolerance and equal protection of the laws enshrined in the text and history of our amended Constitution. Judge Wynn, in his powerful concurrence to the formidable opinion of the court, emphasized this point in no uncertain terms.”



CAC’s “friend of the court” brief on behalf of 165 Members of Congress in International Refugee Assistance Project, et al. v. Trump, et al.:

“Trump’s new Muslim travel ban has same old problems,” Elizabeth Wydra, Seattle Times, April 14, 2017:

“Trump travel ban suspension upheld,” O’Reilly Factor (featuring Elizabeth Wydra), FOX News Channel, February 9, 2017:


Constitutional Accountability Center ( is a think tank, public interest law firm, and action center dedicated to fulfilling the progressive promise of the Constitution’s text and history.


More from Immigration and Citizenship

Immigration and Citizenship
June 3, 2024

Improper DHS Appointment Voids Asylum Rule, Groups Argue

Law360 (June 3, 2024, 8:43 PM EDT) -- Two immigrant advocacy groups suing the federal...
By: Brian R. Frazelle, Ali Sullivan
Immigration and Citizenship
June 23, 2023

RELEASE: Supreme Court Decision Allows Administration to Prioritize Certain Noncitizens for Immigration Enforcement, as Presidential Administrations Have Done for Decades

WASHINGTON, DC – Following the Supreme Court’s announcement of its decision this morning in United...
By: Smita Ghosh
Immigration and Citizenship
January 17, 2023

RELEASE: Supreme Court Considers Access to Courts for Asylum-Seekers

WASHINGTON, DC – Following oral argument at the Supreme Court this morning in Santos-Zacaria v....
By: Smita Ghosh
Immigration and Citizenship
November 29, 2022

RELEASE: Justices Acknowledge the Federal Government’s Authority over Immigration Enforcement When Confronted With State Opposition

WASHINGTON, DC – Following oral argument at the Supreme Court this morning in United States...
By: Smita Ghosh
Immigration and Citizenship
September 19, 2022

RELEASE: Biden Administration Memo Setting Priorities for Immigration Enforcement Is Lawful, Group of Former DHS and INS Officials Tell Supreme Court

WASHINGTON, DC – Earlier today, the Constitutional Accountability Center (CAC) filed a brief in the...
By: Smita Ghosh
Immigration and Citizenship
U.S. Supreme Court

United States v. Texas

In United States v. Texas, the Supreme Court considered whether Department of Homeland Security guidance on immigration enforcement priorities is lawful.