Civil and Human Rights

RELEASE: Chief Justice Roberts Could Determine Fate Of Abortion Law

“During yesterday’s oral argument in the CFPB case, Chief Justice Roberts suggested that the Court’s ‘recent precedent should have a binding effect on how the Court addresses [that] case.’ If the Chief Justice follows his own counsel, he will vote to strike down Louisiana’s law.” — CAC Civil Rights Director David Gans

WASHINGTON – Following oral argument at the Supreme Court this morning in June Medical Services L.L.C. v. Russo, Constitutional Accountability Center Civil Rights Director David Gans, present for today’s proceedings, issued the following reaction:

Four years ago in Whole Woman’s Health, the Supreme Court struck down a Texas admitting privileges requirement, finding that it was an arbitrary requirement that made it harder for individuals to obtain access to abortion and advanced no health interest. If the Court follows its own precedent it will strike down Louisiana’s law as a sham designed to hinder abortion access.

During this morning’s argument, no one offered any reason why the Court should depart from Whole Woman’s Health and uphold Louisiana’s identical law. Indeed, if anything, the answers to the Justices’ many questions about the record illustrated that Louisiana’s law imposes severe burdens—as Texas’s did—because of the difficulty of obtaining admitting privileges and providing no benefits of any kind. The law is an arbitrary infringement on fundamental rights that the Constitution does not countenance.

During yesterday’s oral argument in the CFPB case, Chief Justice Roberts suggested that the Court’s “recent precedent should have a binding effect on how the Court addresses [that] case.” If the Chief Justice follows his own counsel, he will vote to strike down Louisiana’s law.

#

Resources:

CAC case page in June Medical Services L.L.C. v. Russo: https://www.theusconstitution.org/litigation/june-medical-services-l-l-c-v-gee/

“Justices to hear first major abortion case of Trump era,” The Hill (quoting David Gans), February 29. 2020: https://thehill.com/regulation/court-battles/485246-justices-to-hear-first-major-abortion-case-of-trump-era

“Chief Justice John Roberts’ Next Move Will Tell Us A Lot,” Brianne Gorod and Rebecca Damante, Take Care blog, February 13, 2020: https://takecareblog.com/blog/chief-justice-john-roberts-next-move-will-tell-us-a-lot

##

Constitutional Accountability Center is a think tank, public interest law firm, and action center dedicated to fulfilling the progressive promise of the Constitution’s text and history. Visit CAC’s website at www.theusconstitution.org.

###

More from Civil and Human Rights

Civil and Human Rights
July 18, 2026

Arnie Arnesen Attitude July 16 2026

Attitude with Arnie Arnesen
CAC’s David H. Gans joined The Attitude with Arnie Arnesen to discuss the Reconstruction Amendments. Listen...
Civil and Human Rights
U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York

Wridt v. City of New York

In Wridt v. City of New York, the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York is considering whether the NYPD’s mass surveillance system is unconstitutional.
Civil and Human Rights
July 8, 2026

Ruling Away From America’s Second Founding

Slate
CAC’s David H. Gans wrote about the Roberts Court for Slate magazine. Read more in Slate.
By: David H. Gans
Civil and Human Rights
July 1, 2026

Furthering Inclusive Constitutionalism

Jotwell
Professor Allison Brownell Tirres reviewed recent scholarship on the Black Conventions of Reconstruction by CAC’s David H....
Civil and Human Rights
June 30, 2026

CAC Release: Roberts Court’s Conservative Supermajority Hollows Out Equal Protection Guarantee

WASHINGTON, DC – Following today’s decision at the Supreme Court in Little v. Hecox and West Virginia...
By: David H. Gans, Praveen Fernandes, Joshua Blecher-Cohen
Civil and Human Rights
U.S. Supreme Court

Department of Labor v. Sun Valley Orchards, LLC

In Department of Labor v. Sun Valley Orchards, LLC, the Supreme Court is considering whether the Constitution permits the Department of Labor to use administrative proceedings to impose civil monetary penalties on employers who violate...