Access to Justice

Over 30 Organizations Sound Alarm to Protect Juries in Trump Trials

WASHINGTON, D.C. – Today more than 30 organizations issued an open letter calling for the protection of jurors after attacks from Trump and his allies, and cautions that those attacks will only increase as federal and state criminal trials near. The letter was reported exclusively by the Atlanta Journal-Constitution.

“Jurors–past, present, and future–are under attack from Donald Trump and those who do his bidding,” says the letter. “The attacks are sure to accelerate with the approach of his criminal conspiracy trials in Washington and Atlanta for his attempt to undermine our constitutional republic and to overturn the results of the 2020 election.”

The letter was organized by the Not Above the Law coalition and signed by Public Citizen, Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington (CREW), Constitutional Accountability Center, Government Accountability Project, People for the American Way, Sierra Club, Stand Up America, and dozens of other organizations across the country.

The letter cites Trump’s recent harassment of jurors in Georgia and Washington, D.C. On August 17, reports emerged that Trump’s followers posted online attacks on the Fulton County, Georgia grand jurors who voted to indict him. As Georgia law provides, these grand jurors were identified on the indictment.

On September 6, Fani Willis felt compelled to ask the Fulton County Superior Court to protect the identities of trial jurors and potential trial jurors as the trials move forward. On September 26, a Fulton County judge ruled that the identity of jurors in the Georgia trials of Trump and his 18 co-defendants must be protected.

Additionally, three days after a D.C. grand jury indicted Trump, he posted on social media, “If you go after me, I will come after you.” Later in August, he posted, there was “no way” he could get a fair trial in the District. It’s hard to miss the import of this message in a jurisdiction that draws its jury pool from a population of which 45% are Black Americans.

“His attacks are designed to eviscerate an institution of justice inherited from English law and in existence in America before the Constitution that enshrined it. Juries protect individual freedom,” says the letter, which concludes that “It is up to all of us…to speak up and defend such institutions under attack.”

More from Access to Justice

Access to Justice
February 20, 2024

RELEASE: Court Grapples Once Again with Federal Arbitration Act’s Exemption for Transportation Workers

WASHINGTON, DC – Following oral argument at the Supreme Court this morning in Bissonnette v....
By: Miriam Becker-Cohen
Access to Justice
February 19, 2024

Bakery Drivers Head to High Court Searching for Arbitration Exit

Bloomberg Law
Industry test would add fights on transportation firm meaning With circuits split, high court to...
By: Miriam Becker-Cohen, Jennifer Bennett
Access to Justice
January 31, 2024

The 5th Circuit Says Criminalizing Journalism Is Not Obviously Unconstitutional: The Appeals Court Dismissed a Civil Rights Lawsuit by a Laredo Gadfly Who Was Arrested for Asking Questions

Creators
Five years ago, the Harris County, Texas, Institute of Forensic Sciences sent me reports on...
Access to Justice
January 30, 2024

She Was Arrested for Her Journalism. A Federal Court Says She Can’t Sue.

Reason
Priscilla Villarreal, also known as “Lagordiloca,” has sparked a debate about free speech and who,...
Access to Justice
January 24, 2024

‘That’s Wrong for Several Reasons’: 7 Judges Dissent in This Divisive Case

Law.com
“If any principle of constitutional law ought to unite all of us as Americans, it’s...
Access to Justice
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Merck v. Walmart

In Merck v. Walmart, the Sixth Circuit is considering whether employees and job applicants deprived of their right to notice and an opportunity to be heard before being subjected to an adverse action on the...