Immigration and Citizenship

Poppycock!’: Judge Blocks Trump Policy Tapping Border Agents to Screen Asylum-Seekers

A federal judge in Washington, D.C., on Monday blocked a Trump administration policy that allowed border patrol agents to conduct credible fear assessments for asylum-seekers, finding it likely violated federal immigration law.

Senior District Judge Richard Leon issued the preliminary injunction against a January 2020 memorandum of understanding that allowed agents with U.S. Customs and Border Patrol to handle the screenings typically conducted by U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services officers. The administration had previously allowed the border patrol agents to administer the assessments, but Leon found only the more recent memo was being challenged in the suit.

Leon, who was nominated to the bench by President George W. Bush, is the latest conservative judge on the D.C. federal court to rule against the Trump administration on asylum. U.S. District Judge Timothy Kelly, a Trump appointee, earlier this year threw out a rule that prevented migrants from obtaining asylum if they did not seek the protections in another country while traveling to the southern border.

In Monday’s opinion, Leon found the migrants would succeed in showing that border patrol agents “receive substantially less training than CIS asylum officers to conduct asylum interviews” in violation of the Immigration and Nationality Act.

The federal immigration law requires that officers who conduct the interviews—in which migrants must show they face at least a 10% chance of persecution due to certain factors in order to be eligible for asylum—receive significant training on handling the applications.

In responding to the administration’s claims that the border patrol agents received similar training as asylum officers, Leon wrote, “Poppycock! The training requirements cited in the government’s declaration do not come close to being ‘comparable’ to the training requirements of full asylum officers.”

“To make matters worse, the January MOA precludes any individual CBP agent from conducting credible fear interviews for longer than 180 days, meaning that CBP agents cannot gain the experience necessary to appropriately apply the complex asylum laws and regulations,” the judge added. “These procedures plainly violate Congress’s requirements.”

The Trump administration has administered a widespread crackdown on asylum proceedings, adopting a slew of policies that make it more difficult for migrants fleeing persecution in other countries to obtain protections in the United States.

The ruling comes in a lawsuit filed by attorneys with Tahirih Justice Center and the Constitutional Accountability Center, on behalf of four mothers and their seven children from Honduras, Ecuador and Mexico seeking asylum in the U.S. All of the migrants failed to pass the credible fear assessment conducted by CBP agents, which were upheld by immigration judges.

Leon also found in Monday’s ruling that it “would certainly seem unlikely” that CBP agent interviews of migrants could be considered to be “nonadversarial proceedings with a neutral decision-maker,” as required under federal regulations and guidelines. He noted that border patrol agents are considered law enforcement, and said federal authorities’ statements on measures they have taken to minimize the possibility of the interviews becoming adversarial “hardly seems sufficient.”

Leon wrote the training requirements for those conducting the credible fear assessments “are essential for a functioning asylum process, which is why Congress required them,” describing the legal framework surrounding U.S. immigration, asylum, and other similar processes as “complex, to say the least.”

“After all, an asylum officer who is not adequately trained in the applicable legal requirements is less likely to ask the right questions of an asylum seeker, or for that matter, to gather the facts necessary to make an accurate determination of whether an asylum seeker has a credible fear of persecution,” he continued. “Indeed, the record here contains several examples of the effects of inadequate training: one CBP agent failed to follow up with questions about an asylum-seeking plaintiff’s sexual abuse, and another failed to inquire into another asylum-seeking plaintiffs husband’s murder investigation.”

Leon also found the immigrants in the case would face irreparable harm, if he did not issue a preliminary injunction to block their removal from the U.S.

More from Immigration and Citizenship

Immigration and Citizenship
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Community Legal Services in East Palo Alto v. HHS

In Community Legal Services in East Palo Alto v. HHS, the Ninth Circuit is considering whether to stay a district court decision that prevented the Office of Refugee Resettlement from cutting off funding for legal...
Immigration and Citizenship
U.S. Court of Appeals for the First Circuit

New Hampshire Indonesian Community Support v. Trump

In New Hampshire Indonesian Community Support v. Trump, the First Circuit is considering whether to affirm a preliminary injunction blocking the Trump Administration’s executive order purporting to limit birthright citizenship to children who have at...
Immigration and Citizenship
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

CASA v. Trump

In CASA v. Trump, the Fourth Circuit is considering whether to affirm a preliminary injunction blocking the Trump Administration’s executive order purporting to limit birthright citizenship to children who have at least one parent who...
Immigration and Citizenship
June 4, 2025

CAC Release: At Ninth Circuit Oral Argument, Trump Administration Attempts to Advance Radical Alteration to the Constitution’s Birthright Citizenship Guarantee

WASHINGTON, DC – Following oral argument at the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals today in...
Immigration and Citizenship
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

W.M.M. v. Trump

In W.M.M. v. Trump, the Fifth Circuit is considering whether President Trump can use the Alien Enemies Act to send Venezuelan immigrants to a prison in El Salvador.
Immigration and Citizenship
May 27, 2025

La ciudadanía por nacimiento NO era solo para los “hijos de los esclavos”: la historia desmiente a Trump

Univision
En su cuenta de Truth Social, el mandatario desinformó sobre el derecho establecido para todos...