Access to Justice

RELEASE: CAC Statement on Supreme Court’s unanimous New Prime decision interpreting the Federal Arbitration Act

“Today’s decision shows that even a business-friendly Supreme Court can be persuaded to rule for workers when presented with strong arguments rooted in text and history.”

WASHINGTON, DC – Upon learning of the Supreme Court’s unanimous 8-0 decision in New Prime, Inc. v. Oliveira, the Constitutional Accountability Center’s (CAC) Appellate Counsel Brian Frazelle said:

“Today’s decision shows that even a business-friendly Supreme Court can be persuaded to rule for workers when presented with strong arguments rooted in text and history. Corporate America urged the Court to interpret the Federal Arbitration Act in a way that would block many truck drivers and other transportation workers from seeking redress in court for their employers’ illegal behavior. But the Court unanimously rejected this effort to expand corporate immunity. CAC was gratified to see the how the opinion, written by Justice Neil Gorsuch, echoed the arguments made in our brief and drew upon the historical materials we cited in support of those arguments. The Court’s opinion, tracking the history presented in our brief, explains how the statutory terms in dispute here evolved to have different meanings today than they did when the FAA was enacted in 1925. What matters, as we argued and the Court confirmed, is what those words meant when Congress wrote the statute. And when properly understood in that way, the FAA’s language does not prevent workers like the plaintiff in this case from vindicating their rights in court.”

CAC filed its amicus brief with the Supreme Court on July 25, 2018 in support of Respondent Dominic Oliviera, the truck driver whose right to his day in court was being challenged by New Prime, Inc.

#

Resources:

Slate article on New Prime, Inc. v. Oliveira written by CAC’s Brianne Gorod and Brian Frazelle, published October 5, 2018: https://slate.com/news-and-politics/2018/10/john-roberts-arbitration-truckers-new-prime.html

##

Constitutional Accountability Center is a think tank, public interest law firm, and action center dedicated to fulfilling the progressive promise of the Constitution’s text and history. Visit the CAC website at www.theusconstitution.org

###

More from Access to Justice

Access to Justice
October 7, 2024

RELEASE: State Law Can’t Force Civil Rights Plaintiffs into ‘Kafkaesque’ Process

WASHINGTON, DC – Following oral argument at the Supreme Court this morning in Williams v....
Access to Justice
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Mick v. Gibbons

In Mick v. Gibbons, the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit is considering whether the doctrine of state sovereign immunity applies to third party subpoenas.
Access to Justice
July 23, 2024

Bissonnette and the Future of Federal Arbitration

The Regulatory Review
Every year, there are a handful of Supreme Court cases that do not make headlines...
By: Miriam Becker-Cohen
Access to Justice
June 20, 2024

RELEASE: Supreme Court rejects artificial limit on liability for speech-based retaliation by government officers

WASHINGTON, DC – Following today’s Supreme Court decision in Gonzalez v. Trevino, a case in...
By: Brian R. Frazelle
Access to Justice
May 9, 2024

RELEASE: In overbroad ruling, conservative majority restricts the rights of innocent car owners whose vehicles are seized by the government

WASHINGTON, DC – Following today’s decision at the Supreme Court in Culley v. Marshall, a...
By: Brian R. Frazelle
Access to Justice
U.S. Supreme Court

Williams v. Washington

In Williams v. Washington, the Supreme Court is considering whether states may force civil rights litigants who bring claims against state officials in state court under Section 1983 to first exhaust their administrative remedies.