Access to Justice

RELEASE: Chamber Scores Big Win with Gorsuch Opinion Against Workers

WASHINGTON—On news today that the U.S. Supreme Court issued its ruling in Epic Systems Corporation, et al. v. Jacob Lewis, et al., holding that employers can force their workers into individual arbitration even though federal law guarantees workers the right to engage in collective action, Constitutional Accountability Center—which filed a friend of the court brief in support of the workers—released the following reaction from CAC President Elizabeth Wydra:

Last year, I said that “the conservative interest groups who lobbied and spent millions of dollars on the Gorsuch confirmation have tried to reduce the new Justice to something of a legal vending machine.” Justice Gorsuch’s opinion today in Epic has only validated that. Completely ignoring the text and history of the National Labor Relations Act to reach a pro-arbitration result is precisely the type of outcome the business community was counting on.

Justice Ginsburg, “explain[ing] why the Court’s decision is egregiously wrong,” once again demolished the Court’s persistent attack on the ability of ordinary Americans to access this country’s courts of justice—a value enshrined in our Constitution from the very beginning. Citing our brief in her masterful dissent, Ginsburg shows why Justice Gorsuch’s opinion for the Court’s five conservatives “paints an ahistorical picture,” ignoring the rich history of group litigation in America.

Make no mistake, working people in this country will be hurt by today’s ruling, while the U.S. Chamber of Commerce will surely consider this an early return on their investment in President Trump’s highest-profile judicial nomination.



CAC’s brief in Epic Systems Corporation, et al. v. Jacob Lewis, et al.: (cited on page 16 of Justice Ginsburg’s dissenting opinion.)

“The Supreme Court’s New Term,” David Gans, Balkinization, September 29, 2017:

Remarks of Elizabeth Wydra at CAC’s Fourth Annual Home Stretch at the Supreme Court, April 27, 2017:

“Corporate Clout: As The Roberts Court Transforms, The Chamber Has Another Big Term | October Term 2016,” Brian Frazelle, July 26, 2017:


Now in our tenth year, Constitutional Accountability Center is a think tank, public interest law firm, and action center dedicated to fulfilling the progressive promise of the Constitution’s text and history. Visit the new CAC website at


More from Access to Justice

Access to Justice
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Federal Defenders of New York v. Federal Bureau of Prisons

In Federal Defenders of New York v. Federal Bureau of Prisons, the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit is considering whether the ability to sue over constitutional violations is limited by a “zone of interests” test.
Access to Justice
June 1, 2019

The Border Search Muddle

Harvard Law Review
Fourth Amendment originalism is hard. But if Fourth Amendment originalism has an easy case, the...
Access to Justice
June 7, 2019

Cross-border shooting in Nogales likely to turn on ruling in Texas case

Cronkite News
When a Border Patrol agent standing in Nogales shot and killed a teen in Mexico...
Access to Justice
May 31, 2019

OP-ED: The Supreme Court Just Made It Easier for Police to Arrest You for Filming Them

The First Amendment makes it unconstitutional for government officials to retaliate against you because they...
By: Brian R. Frazelle
Access to Justice
May 28, 2019

RELEASE: CAC Expresses Disappointment In Supreme Court’s Nieves Ruling

“The Court makes it more likely that, as Justice Sotomayor expressed in her dissent, the...
By: Praveen Fernandes, Brian R. Frazelle
Access to Justice
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Sierra Club and Southern Border Communities Coalition v. Trump; State of California v. Trump

In Sierra Club and Southern Border Communities Coalition v. Trump and State of California v. Trump, the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California considered whether President Trump can lawfully divert funds that...