Access to Justice

RELEASE: Chamber Scores Big Win with Gorsuch Opinion Against Workers

WASHINGTON—On news today that the U.S. Supreme Court issued its ruling in Epic Systems Corporation, et al. v. Jacob Lewis, et al., holding that employers can force their workers into individual arbitration even though federal law guarantees workers the right to engage in collective action, Constitutional Accountability Center—which filed a friend of the court brief in support of the workers—released the following reaction from CAC President Elizabeth Wydra:

Last year, I said that “the conservative interest groups who lobbied and spent millions of dollars on the Gorsuch confirmation have tried to reduce the new Justice to something of a legal vending machine.” Justice Gorsuch’s opinion today in Epic has only validated that. Completely ignoring the text and history of the National Labor Relations Act to reach a pro-arbitration result is precisely the type of outcome the business community was counting on.

Justice Ginsburg, “explain[ing] why the Court’s decision is egregiously wrong,” once again demolished the Court’s persistent attack on the ability of ordinary Americans to access this country’s courts of justice—a value enshrined in our Constitution from the very beginning. Citing our brief in her masterful dissent, Ginsburg shows why Justice Gorsuch’s opinion for the Court’s five conservatives “paints an ahistorical picture,” ignoring the rich history of group litigation in America.

Make no mistake, working people in this country will be hurt by today’s ruling, while the U.S. Chamber of Commerce will surely consider this an early return on their investment in President Trump’s highest-profile judicial nomination.



CAC’s brief in Epic Systems Corporation, et al. v. Jacob Lewis, et al.: (cited on page 16 of Justice Ginsburg’s dissenting opinion.)

“The Supreme Court’s New Term,” David Gans, Balkinization, September 29, 2017:

Remarks of Elizabeth Wydra at CAC’s Fourth Annual Home Stretch at the Supreme Court, April 27, 2017:

“Corporate Clout: As The Roberts Court Transforms, The Chamber Has Another Big Term | October Term 2016,” Brian Frazelle, July 26, 2017:


Now in our tenth year, Constitutional Accountability Center is a think tank, public interest law firm, and action center dedicated to fulfilling the progressive promise of the Constitution’s text and history. Visit the new CAC website at


More from Access to Justice

Access to Justice
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

National Veterans Legal Services Program v. United States

In National Veterans Legal Services Program v. United States, the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit is considering whether the government violates the E-Government Act of 2002 when it charges fees to...
Access to Justice
January 15, 2019

The Supreme Court Just Handed a Big, Unanimous Victory to Workers. Wait, What?

On Tuesday, the Supreme Court handed a victory to American workers, ruling unanimously that independent...
Access to Justice
January 15, 2019

RELEASE: CAC Statement on Supreme Court’s unanimous New Prime decision interpreting the Federal Arbitration Act

“Today’s decision shows that even a business-friendly Supreme Court can be persuaded to rule for...
By: Brian R. Frazelle
Access to Justice
U.S. Supreme Court

Nieves v. Bartlett

In Nieves v. Bartlett, the Supreme Court is considering whether people who allege they were arrested in retaliation for their speech, in violation of the First Amendment, are prevented from seeking damages for that violation...
Access to Justice
July 26, 2018

OOIDA files amicus brief to High Court in support of truck driver’s case against Prime

Land Line Magazine
The Owner-Operator Independent Drivers Association has filed an amicus brief to the U.S. Supreme Court...
Access to Justice
U.S. Supreme Court

New Prime, Inc. v. Oliveira

In New Prime, Inc. v. Oliveira, the Supreme Court considered whether companies can use the Federal Arbitration Act to block truck drivers and other transportation workers who work for them from seeking redress in court...