Immigration and Citizenship

RELEASE: Conservative Justices Abdicate Duty to Check President’s Unconstitutional Anti-Muslim Animus

Chief Justice Roberts hears no evil, Justice Kennedy sees no evil, and Justice Gorsuch says no evil in the face of the president who appointed him, who as a candidate proudly and loudly called for “a complete and total shutdown of Muslims entering the United States.”

WASHINGTON—On news this morning that the U.S. Supreme Court issued its ruling in Hawaii v. Trump, upholding President Donald Trump’s Muslim travel ban as lawful, Constitutional Accountability Center President Elizabeth Wydra issued the following reaction:

The Framers of America’s Constitution established the courts, in part, to be a check on the political branches of our government. To pull them back into line when they stray from founding principles and the letter of our laws and speak with the voice of the final authority on what our Constitution means.

Today, five conservative justices set this grave duty aside and instead gave license to the worst impulses of a president who has made no secret of his racial, ethnic, and religious prejudice against people who identify as Muslims. Rather than heed the words of James Madison, who said “the Religion … of every man must be left to the conviction and conscience of every man,” today five conservative justices—some of whom have the chutzpah to call themselves originalists—instead chose to bury their heads in the sand rather than follow the clear import of the Constitution’s text and history. Chief Justice Roberts hears no evil, Justice Kennedy sees no evil, and Justice Gorsuch says no evil in the face of the president who appointed him, who as a candidate proudly and loudly called for “a complete and total shutdown of Muslims entering the United States.”

Justice Sotomayor summed up today’s abdication of the court’s duty perfectly today, writing, “Our Constitution demands, and our country deserves, a Judiciary willing to hold the coordinate branches to account when they defy our most sacred legal commitments. [T]he Court’s decision today has failed in that respect.”

#

Resources:

CAC’s brief on behalf of Members of Congress explaining by President Trump’s Muslim travel ban violates the Constitution and Immigration and Nationality Act: https://www.theusconstitution.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/03/Trump_v_Hawaii_Cert_Amicus_Final.pdf

##

Now in our tenth year, Constitutional Accountability Center is a think tank, public interest law firm, and action center dedicated to fulfilling the progressive promise of the Constitution’s text and history. Visit the new CAC website at www.theusconstitution.org.

###

More from Immigration and Citizenship

Immigration and Citizenship
April 1, 2026

CAC Release: Justices Skeptical of Administration’s Domicile-Driven Approach to Birthright Citizenship

WASHINGTON, DC – Following oral argument at the Supreme Court this morning in Trump v....
By: Smita Ghosh
Immigration and Citizenship
March 31, 2026

Most Americans Favor Birthright Citizenship. That Wasn’t Always True.

New York Times
Elizabeth Wydra was quoted in the New York Times discussing the history of the Fourteenth Amendment's Citizenship...
Immigration and Citizenship
March 30, 2026

Why the Supreme Court will get the birthright citizenship case right

National Catholic Reporter
Smita Ghosh's Slate article about Lynch v. Clarke and birthright citizenship was cited in an op-ed in the National Catholic...
Immigration and Citizenship
March 21, 2026

Legal History Blog Weekly Roundup

Legal History Blog
CAC Senior Appellate Counsel Smita Ghosh's article in Slate about birthright citizenship was cited in...
Immigration and Citizenship
March 24, 2026

CAC Release: Justices Consider Government’s Novel Reading of Law Concerning Asylum-Seekers at the Border

WASHINGTON, DC – Following oral argument at the Supreme Court this morning in Noem v....
By: Smita Ghosh
Immigration and Citizenship
March 20, 2026

The Supreme Court’s Birthright Citizenship Decision Hinges on a Case You’ve Never Heard Of

CAC Senior Appellate Counsel Smita Ghosh's article about the history of birthright citizenship in Slate magazine was featured...
By: Smita Ghosh