Criminal Justice

RELEASE: Court’s Conservatives Take Battering Ram to Miranda, Accountability

WASHINGTON, DC – Following the Supreme Court’s ruling today in Vega v. Tekoh, Constitutional Accountability Center President Elizabeth Wydra issued the following reaction:

The Supreme Court’s six-justice conservative majority today took a battering ram to one of the most cherished constitutional rights in America. It is also one of the most recognized rights in America, as anyone who has watched a police procedural on television can probably quote much of it by heart.

In Vega, the conservative majority closes the courthouse doors to persons suing in a court of law to vindicate the Fifth Amendment rights safeguarded by Miranda. Justice Alito’s opinion is based in part on the idea that Miranda is not a constitutional right. This is dead wrong. When the Fifth Amendment was ratified, it was understood to be safeguarding a right against self-incrimination that had long existed under the common law, functioning as a direct limit on how officials questioned suspected offenders. The text of the Fifth Amendment reflects the Framers’ broad goals, and nothing in that text reduces the Self-Incrimination Clause to a mere rule of evidence for prosecutors and courts. Thus, under the original understanding of the Fifth Amendment, Officer Vega participated in the deprivation of Tekoh’s constitutional rights.

Justice Alito’s opinion also ignores that Congress, in enacting Section 1983, created an express cause of action to allow individuals to sue to redress violations of constitutional rights by state and local actors. By gutting the remedy Congress provided in Section 1983, the 6-3 conservative majority hollows out Miranda. In so doing, the conservative majority of the Roberts Court does again what it has done far too often: rewrites the law in a way that facilitates police abuse by putting accountability out of reach.



CAC case page in Vega v. Tekoh:

CAC BLOG: “Awaiting Major Cases in the Shadow of Dobbs,” Charles Miller, May 17, 2022:


Constitutional Accountability Center is a think tank, public interest law firm, and action center dedicated to fulfilling the progressive promise of the Constitution’s text and history. Visit CAC’s website at


More from Criminal Justice

Criminal Justice
June 23, 2022

Law enforcement officers cannot be sued for failing to inform criminal suspects about their right against self-incrimination.

Washington Post
The court also found that law enforcement officers cannot be sued for failing to inform...
By: Elizabeth B. Wydra, By Robert Barnes, By Ann E. Marimow
Criminal Justice
June 27, 2022

U.S. Supreme Court’s ‘Miranda’ decision further guts 150-year-old civil rights law

(Reuters) - A U.S. Supreme Court decision on Thursday illustrated the extent to which the...
By: David H. Gans, By Hassan Kanu
Criminal Justice
June 27, 2022

RELEASE: Victory for Fairness for Beneficiaries of First Step Act

WASHINGTON, DC – Following the Supreme Court’s ruling today in Concepcion v. United States, Constitutional...
By: Elizabeth B. Wydra
Criminal Justice
U.S. Supreme Court

Vega v. Tekoh

In Vega v. Tekoh, the Supreme Court is considering whether police officers who detain and question suspects without providing Miranda warnings can be held accountable when the statements they obtain are used against those suspects...
Criminal Justice
March 6, 2022

Supreme Court considers whether federal police may be sued for excessive force in 2014 case against a Border Patrol agent

CNN — The US Supreme Court is considering a case that could change the broad immunity from...
Criminal Justice
U.S. Supreme Court

Concepcion v. United States

In Concepcion v. United States, the Supreme Court considered whether a district court can take account of intervening legal and factual developments when exercising its authority to “impose a reduced sentence” under Section 404(b) of the First...