Criminal Law

RELEASE: Court’s Conservatives Take Battering Ram to Miranda, Accountability

WASHINGTON, DC – Following the Supreme Court’s ruling today in Vega v. Tekoh, Constitutional Accountability Center President Elizabeth Wydra issued the following reaction:

The Supreme Court’s six-justice conservative majority today took a battering ram to one of the most cherished constitutional rights in America. It is also one of the most recognized rights in America, as anyone who has watched a police procedural on television can probably quote much of it by heart.

In Vega, the conservative majority closes the courthouse doors to persons suing in a court of law to vindicate the Fifth Amendment rights safeguarded by Miranda. Justice Alito’s opinion is based in part on the idea that Miranda is not a constitutional right. This is dead wrong. When the Fifth Amendment was ratified, it was understood to be safeguarding a right against self-incrimination that had long existed under the common law, functioning as a direct limit on how officials questioned suspected offenders. The text of the Fifth Amendment reflects the Framers’ broad goals, and nothing in that text reduces the Self-Incrimination Clause to a mere rule of evidence for prosecutors and courts. Thus, under the original understanding of the Fifth Amendment, Officer Vega participated in the deprivation of Tekoh’s constitutional rights.

Justice Alito’s opinion also ignores that Congress, in enacting Section 1983, created an express cause of action to allow individuals to sue to redress violations of constitutional rights by state and local actors. By gutting the remedy Congress provided in Section 1983, the 6-3 conservative majority hollows out Miranda. In so doing, the conservative majority of the Roberts Court does again what it has done far too often: rewrites the law in a way that facilitates police abuse by putting accountability out of reach.

#

Resources:

CAC case page in Vega v. Tekoh: https://www.theusconstitution.org/litigation/vega-v-tekoh/

CAC BLOG: “Awaiting Major Cases in the Shadow of Dobbs,” Charles Miller, May 17, 2022: https://www.theusconstitution.org/blog/awaiting-major-cases-in-the-shadow-of-dobbs/

##

Constitutional Accountability Center is a think tank, public interest law firm, and action center dedicated to fulfilling the progressive promise of the Constitution’s text and history. Visit CAC’s website at www.theusconstitution.org.

###

More from Criminal Law

Criminal Law
July 28, 2026

CAC Release: In Important Victory for Digital Privacy, Supreme Court Holds that Even Short-Term Police Monitoring of Cell-Phone Location Information Is Regulated by the Fourth Amendment

WASHINGTON, DC – Following today’s decision at the Supreme Court in Chatrie v. United States,...
By: Brian R. Frazelle
Criminal Law
May 28, 2026

CAC Release: Supreme Court Recognizes Clear Pathway to Habeas Relief in Mississippi Jury Race-Discrimination Case

WASHINGTON, DC – Following today’s decision at the Supreme Court in Pitchford v. Cain, a...
Criminal Law
May 28, 2026

CAC Release: Supreme Court Majority Rules that Judges Cannot Consider Changing Views of Crime when Reducing Sentences

WASHINGTON, DC – Following the Supreme Court’s decision this morning in Rutherford v. United States...
Criminal Law
May 28, 2026

CAC Release: Court’s Commitment to Text and History Falters in Compassionate Release Case

WASHINGTON, DC – Following the Supreme Court’s decision in Fernandez v. United States, a case...
Criminal Law
April 27, 2026

CAC Release: Justices Push Back Against Government’s Claim of Unrestricted Access to Cell-Phone Location Information

WASHINGTON, DC – Following oral argument at the Supreme Court this morning in Chatrie v....
By: Brian R. Frazelle
Criminal Law
March 31, 2026

CAC Release: Supreme Court Considers Availability of Habeas Relief in Mississippi Jury Race-Discrimination Case

WASHINGTON, DC – Following oral argument at the Supreme Court this morning in Pitchford v....
By: Joshua Blecher-Cohen