Voting Rights and Democracy

RELEASE: In Huge Win for Voting Rights, Roberts Court Reaffirms that Voting Rights Act Prohibits Vote Dilution and Strikes Down Alabama’s Discriminatory Map

WASHINGTON, DC – Following the Supreme Court’s announcement of its decisions in Allen v. Milligan and Allen v. Caster, Constitutional Accountability Center Director of the Human Rights, Civil Rights, and Citizenship Program David Gans issued the following reaction:

For decades, the Supreme Court has held that the Voting Rights Act prohibits states from drawing maps that dilute the voting strength of communities of color.  Today, in a stunning 5-4 ruling written by Chief Justice John Roberts that confounded expectations, the Court reaffirmed these precedents and struck down Alabama’s 2022 congressional map, which packed and cracked communities of color in the state to lessen their voting strength.  This is a huge win that reaffirms the Constitution’s promise of an inclusive multiracial democracy, Congress’s power to annul discriminatory maps, and the Court’s longstanding interpretation of the Voting Rights Act.

Today’s ruling does not change the law, but it marks a decisive shift toward a proper recognition of the Fifteenth Amendment’s promise of a multiracial democracy and Congress’s power to eradicate voting discrimination.  After a spate of dangerous rulings that opened the door to racial discrimination in voting, such as Shelby County v. Holder and Brnovich v. DNC, a majority of the Court resoundingly affirmed the Fifteenth Amendment’s guarantee of political equality for all citizens regardless of race and the broad text of the Voting Rights Act designed to enforce the promise of racial equality at the polls.

##

Resources:

Case page in Allen v. Milligan and Allen v. Caster: https://www.theusconstitution.org/litigation/merril-v-milligan/

David H. Gans, Race-Consciousness Is Baked into the Constitution’s Text and History, CAC Blog: https://www.theusconstitution.org/blog/blog-race-consciousness-is-baked-into-the-constitutions-text-and-history/

##

More from Voting Rights and Democracy

Voting Rights and Democracy
Wisconsin Supreme Court

Wisconsin Business Leaders for Democracy v. Wisconsin Elections Commission

In Wisconsin Business Leaders for Democracy v. Wisconsin Elections Commission, the Wisconsin Supreme Court is considering the legality of Wisconsin’s congressional redistricting map.
Voting Rights and Democracy
July 8, 2026

“Ruling Away From America’s Second Founding” on the Election Law Blog

Election Law Blog
David Gans’s Slate article on the Roberts Court was featured on Election Law Blog. Read more.
Voting Rights and Democracy
June 30, 2026

CAC Release: Roberts Court Strikes Down Yet Another Campaign Finance Law, Turns Blind Eye to Corruption

WASHINGTON, DC – Following today’s decision at the Supreme Court in National Republican Senatorial Committee...
By: Miriam Becker-Cohen, David H. Gans
Voting Rights and Democracy
June 29, 2026

CAC Release: Supreme Court Rebukes Fifth Circuit, Affirms State Authority to Permit Post-Election Receipt of Mail Ballots

WASHINGTON, DC – Following today’s decision at the Supreme Court in Watson v. Republican National...
By: David H. Gans, Simon Chin
Voting Rights and Democracy
June 21, 2026

Guns, Weed, and the Forgotten Framers

Slate
CAC's David H. Gans discussed his forthcoming paper in the Stanford Law Review on the Black Conventions...
Voting Rights and Democracy
June 3, 2026

How Congress Can Pass a New Voting Rights Act Despite the Supreme Court

Slate
Director of the Human Rights, Civil Rights & Citizenship David H. Gans wrote an article in...
By: David H. Gans