Health Care

RELEASE: Justices Hear Challenge to OSHA Vaccinate-Or-Test Policy

WASHINGTON – Following oral argument in the Supreme Court in NFIB v. OSHA, Constitutional Accountability Center Chief Counsel Brianne Gorod issued the following reaction:

This morning’s oral argument in the challenge to OSHA’s vaccinate-or-test policy was extraordinary. Even as the nation experiences a massive surge of COVID-19 infections, and even as the Supreme Court itself has adopted a testing and masking policy to guard against the virus, the policy’s challengers repeatedly insisted that OSHA did not have authority to impose protections for the nation’s workers.

That argument is simply wrong. Congress has given OSHA the authority to take necessary actions to protect workers in circumstances like this, and there is no question that Congress’s decision to grant OSHA that authority is constitutional, regardless of whether one looks to Supreme Court precedent or constitutional text and history. Indeed, since the nation’s birth, Congress has delegated broad authority to the executive branch to address the nation’s most pressing problems. If Congress could not do that, it would significantly impair the federal government’s ability to act in the public interest.

Here, OSHA’s vaccinate-or-test policy is a critically important tool for protecting American workers from the grave dangers of COVID-19. The Supreme Court should allow the policy—and the essential protections that it provides to American workers—to remain in place.



CAC case page in NFIB v. OSHA (In Re: OSHA Rule on COVID-19 Vaccination and Testing):

RELEASE: Federal Appeals Court Allows OSHA Vaccinate-Or-Test Policy to Take Effect, December 17, 2021:

RELEASE: CAC Tells Court: Dissolve Fifth Circuit Stay of Vaccinate-or-Test Policy, November 23, 2021:


Constitutional Accountability Center is a think tank, public interest law firm, and action center dedicated to fulfilling the progressive promise of the Constitution’s text and history. Visit CAC’s website at


More from Health Care

Health Care
May 30, 2024

Oklahoma to Ask Court to Unblock HHS Family Planning Money

Bloomberg Law
Oklahoma says HHS can’t require referral for illegal abortion Family planning grant loss expected to...
By: Miriam Becker-Cohen, Mary Anne Pazanowski
Health Care

Oklahoma v. United States Department of Health and Human Services

In Oklahoma v. United States Department of Health and Human Services, the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit is considering whether Title X reproductive healthcare clinics in Oklahoma can defy the federal...
Health Care
April 24, 2024

RELEASE: Justices Grapple with Scope and Effect of Conflict Between EMTALA and Idaho’s Near-Total Abortion Ban

WASHINGTON, DC – Following oral argument at the Supreme Court this morning in Idaho v....
By: Miriam Becker-Cohen
Health Care
March 29, 2024

Amicus Briefs Filed in Support of EMTALA, The Federal Right to Emergency Care, Including Abortion, in Idaho v. United States and Moyle v. United States

National Women's Law Center
A broad coalition of amici filed 27 briefs to the U.S. Supreme Court in support...
Health Care
U.S. Supreme Court

Idaho v. United States

In Idaho v. United States, the Supreme Court is considering whether EMTALA, a federal law requiring hospitals to provide stabilizing treatment to patients experiencing medical emergencies, preempts Idaho’s near-total abortion ban in situations where abortion...
Health Care
March 22, 2024

Supreme Court to rule on FDA approval of abortion drug mifepristone

Fox News
Call it wishful thinking or strategic amnesia, but just two years removed from its controversial...
By: Brianne J. Gorod, Shannon Bream, Bill Mears