Immigration and Citizenship

RELEASE: Key Weaknesses in States’ Position Exposed at Supreme Court Oral Argument re MPP 

WASHINGTON – Following oral argument at the Supreme Court this morning in Biden v. Texas—a case about whether a provision of the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA) requires the Biden administration to continue implementing the Trump Administration’s Migrant Protection Protocols (MPP) in the face of insufficient detention capacity—Constitutional Accountability Center Appellate Counsel Miriam Becker-Cohen issued the following reaction:

While the Justices asked tough questions of both sides, key exchanges echoed points we made in the brief we filed on behalf of a bipartisan group of former officials from the Department of Homeland Security and Immigration and Naturalization Service. Among other examples, Solicitor General Prelogar emphasized, and the Justices seemed to agree, that the Fifth Circuit’s conclusion that MPP is mandatory would have far-reaching implications for the ability of the executive branch to properly manage foreign affairs. Prelogar also highlighted a key point, which we made in our brief, that the parole statute is a viable alternative to MPP in the face of insufficient detention capacity because the requirement that parole be granted on a “case-by-case basis” does not impose any limitation on the total number of noncitizens who may be paroled. Finally, all the Justices seemed to recognize, and the attorney for the States conceded, that under the States’ interpretation of the contiguous territory return provision of the INA, every single administration—including former President Trump’s—has violated that provision. As we explained in our brief, even on its own, that fact suggests that the States’ interpretation is wrong.

We urge the Court to reverse the decision of the Fifth Circuit and look forward to a ruling in the weeks ahead.

#

Resources:

CAC case page in Biden v. Texas, including brief on behalf of a bipartisan group of former Department of Homeland Security and Immigration and Naturalization Service officials: https://www.theusconstitution.org/litigation/biden-v-texas/

CAC Release: Bipartisan Former DHS, INS Officials Say to SCOTUS: Fifth Circuit Got It Wrong on MPP, March 21, 2022: https://www.theusconstitution.org/news/release-bipartisan-former-dhs-ins-officials-say-to-scotus-fifth-circuit-got-it-wrong-on-mpp/

##

Constitutional Accountability Center is a think tank, public interest law firm, and action center dedicated to fulfilling the progressive promise of the Constitution’s text and history. Visit CAC’s website at www.theusconstitution.org.

###

More from Immigration and Citizenship

Immigration and Citizenship
January 21, 2025

States, civil rights groups sue to stop Trump’s birthright citizenship order

Washington Post
Constitutional scholars said the president’s executive order would upend precedent and is unlikely to pass...
Immigration and Citizenship
January 15, 2025

Birthright Citizenship 101

Thank you to our partners at UnidosUS for translating this resource into Spanish. Links to PDF versions...
Immigration and Citizenship
U.S. Supreme Court

Riley v. Garland

In Riley v. Garland, the Supreme Court is considering whether the deadline for appealing an immigration removal order is jurisdictional. 
Immigration and Citizenship
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

United States v. Smith

In United States v. Smith, the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit is considering whether the Fourth Amendment permits law enforcement officers—without a warrant or probable cause—to search and copy the contents...
Immigration and Citizenship
September 10, 2024

Trump, Vance y estos congresistas latinos quieren acabar con la ciudadanía por nacimiento. ¿Pueden hacerlo?

Telemundo
Quien nace en territorio estadounidense es considerado ciudadano por la Constitución desde hace 156 años....
Immigration and Citizenship
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Texas v. Department of Homeland Security

In Texas v. Department of Homeland Security, the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit is hearing a challenge to the Department of Homeland Security’s programs for parole for Cubans, Haitians, Nicaraguans, and...