Voting Rights and Democracy

RELEASE: Partisan Gerrymandering a Critical Test for Chief Justice Roberts

CAC Civil Rights Director David Gans: Preventing the government from entrenching the governing party in power has been a theme of the Chief Justice’s First Amendment jurisprudence. If he follows these fundamental First Amendment principles, he could strike a blow in favor of democracy and ensure that voters choose their representatives, not the other way around.

WASHINGTON – Following oral arguments at the Supreme Court in the partisan gerrymandering cases—Rucho v. Common Cause and Lamone v. Benisek—Constitutional Accountability Center Civil Rights Director David Gans, who watched the arguments at the Court this morning, issued the following reaction:

Last year, Chief Justice Roberts decried judicial intrusion into partisan gerrymandering on the basis of what he called “sociological gobbledygook.” During today’s argument, we saw a more measured Roberts. Although he at times displayed some of his previous skepticism, in a key moment during the second of the two cases heard today, Roberts appeared to recognize that the First Amendment forbids the government from acting to disfavor voters because of their affiliation.

Preventing the government from entrenching the governing party in power has been a theme of the Chief Justice’s First Amendment jurisprudence. If he follows these fundamental First Amendment principles, he could strike a blow in favor of democracy and ensure that voters choose their representatives, not the other way around.

#

Resources:

CAC brief in Rucho v. Common Cause and Lamone v. Benisek: https://www.theusconstitution.org/litigation/rucho-v-common-cause-lamone-v-benisek/

“The Supreme Court Has A Chance To Push Back On Gerrymandering Today: In the past, Chief Justice John Roberts has ruled the First Amendment forbids the government from favoring some voters over others. Will he stick by his words?” David Gans, BuzzFeed, March 26, 2019: https://www.buzzfeednews.com/article/davidgans/opinion-gerrymandering-rigs-democracy-supreme-court

##

Constitutional Accountability Center is a think tank, public interest law firm, and action center dedicated to fulfilling the progressive promise of the Constitution’s text and history. Visit CAC’s website at www.theusconstitution.org.

###

More from Voting Rights and Democracy

Voting Rights and Democracy
U.S. Supreme Court

Brnovich v. DNC; Arizona Republican Party v. DNC

In Brnovich v. DNC and Arizona Republican Party v. DNC, the Supreme Court is considering whether Arizona’s prohibitions on out-of-precinct voting and third-party ballot collection violate Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act.
Voting Rights and Democracy
December 18, 2020

RELEASE: Census Memo A Clear Violation of the Constitution 

“The Court today is plainly wrong to avoid ruling on the merits of this case...
By: Elizabeth B. Wydra
Voting Rights and Democracy
November 30, 2020

OP-ED: The Supreme Court Must Choose Between Trump and the Constitution in the Census Case

Slate
Critics of conservative originalism have charged that it is just a fancy word used to reach...
By: David H. Gans
Voting Rights and Democracy
November 3, 2020

Be Ready for a Lengthy, Vicious Struggle

The New York Times
How will the winning candidate piece together a victory in 2020? David Byler, a data...
By: David H. Gans, By Thomas B. Edsall
Voting Rights and Democracy
October 31, 2020

OP-ED: As Previous Generations Did, Make a Plan to Vote

InsideSources
The right to vote is one of our most cherished fundamental rights. It is guaranteed...
By: David H. Gans
Voting Rights and Democracy
October 30, 2020

Kavanaugh’s Wisconsin Opinion Flunks Originalist Test of Constitution’s Text and History

Take Care
On Monday night, the Supreme Court, in a 5-3 decision, refused to reinstate a Wisconsin district court order...
By: Brianne J. Gorod, Charles Miller