Voting Rights and Democracy

RELEASE: Partisan Gerrymandering a Critical Test for Chief Justice Roberts

CAC Civil Rights Director David Gans: Preventing the government from entrenching the governing party in power has been a theme of the Chief Justice’s First Amendment jurisprudence. If he follows these fundamental First Amendment principles, he could strike a blow in favor of democracy and ensure that voters choose their representatives, not the other way around.

WASHINGTON – Following oral arguments at the Supreme Court in the partisan gerrymandering cases—Rucho v. Common Cause and Lamone v. Benisek—Constitutional Accountability Center Civil Rights Director David Gans, who watched the arguments at the Court this morning, issued the following reaction:

Last year, Chief Justice Roberts decried judicial intrusion into partisan gerrymandering on the basis of what he called “sociological gobbledygook.” During today’s argument, we saw a more measured Roberts. Although he at times displayed some of his previous skepticism, in a key moment during the second of the two cases heard today, Roberts appeared to recognize that the First Amendment forbids the government from acting to disfavor voters because of their affiliation.

Preventing the government from entrenching the governing party in power has been a theme of the Chief Justice’s First Amendment jurisprudence. If he follows these fundamental First Amendment principles, he could strike a blow in favor of democracy and ensure that voters choose their representatives, not the other way around.

#

Resources:

CAC brief in Rucho v. Common Cause and Lamone v. Benisek: https://www.theusconstitution.org/litigation/rucho-v-common-cause-lamone-v-benisek/

“The Supreme Court Has A Chance To Push Back On Gerrymandering Today: In the past, Chief Justice John Roberts has ruled the First Amendment forbids the government from favoring some voters over others. Will he stick by his words?” David Gans, BuzzFeed, March 26, 2019: https://www.buzzfeednews.com/article/davidgans/opinion-gerrymandering-rigs-democracy-supreme-court

##

Constitutional Accountability Center is a think tank, public interest law firm, and action center dedicated to fulfilling the progressive promise of the Constitution’s text and history. Visit CAC’s website at www.theusconstitution.org.

###

More from Voting Rights and Democracy

Voting Rights and Democracy
April 24, 2019

OP-ED: The Census Case Will Define the Roberts Court

Slate
More than two centuries ago, the Constitution’s Framers decided the United States would be the...
By: David H. Gans
Voting Rights and Democracy
April 23, 2019

Supreme Court conservatives appear ready to OK Trump’s census citizenship question

Los Angeles Times
The Supreme Court’s conservative justices appeared ready on Tuesday to uphold the Trump administration’s plan...
Voting Rights and Democracy
April 23, 2019

RELEASE: Court’s Conservatives Send Troubling Signals On Integrity Of 2020 Census

“The integrity of the 2020 Census is clearly at issue in this case, but nothing...
By: Brianne J. Gorod, David H. Gans, Elizabeth B. Wydra
Voting Rights and Democracy
April 13, 2019

Inside Trump administration’s mysterious plan to secure a 2020 census citizenship question

USA Today
Wilbur Ross had just started running the Department of Commerce, but he was growing impatient...
Voting Rights and Democracy
April 11, 2019

Annotated Guide to the Amicus Briefs in the Supreme Court’s Citizenship Question Cases

Brennan Center for Justice
As the Supreme Court takes up challenges to the 2020 Census citizenship question, almost 50...
Voting Rights and Democracy
April 12, 2019

Lincoln Ideas Forum: Voting Rights at Lincoln’s Cottage

Host: Grateful American™ Foundation
Join us as we bring together experts, scholars, and the public in an exploration of...
Participants: Brianne J. Gorod, Lillian Cunningham (Moderator), Robert Tsai, Elaine Weiss, Jason Torchinsky