Constitutional Accountability Center Constitutional Accountability Center
Voting Rights and Democracy

RELEASE: President Trump’s Online Misinformation A Blatant Attempt To Continue Voter Suppression

WASHINGTON – On news of Twitter marking some of President Trump’s tweets with links to facts about mail-in voting, and the President’s responses to that action, Constitutional Accountability Center President Elizabeth Wydra issued the following reaction:

Balancing the values of free speech, equality, and democracy often requires social media companies to engage in some sort of content moderation and to take action to ensure that lies do not go viral. Twitter’s decision to urge users to get the facts in the face of President Trump’s demonstrable lies about mail-in voter fraud—which has been proven over and over not to be a widespread problem—is not only permissible, it is to be applauded. President Trump’s attempt to bully social media companies into letting him spread lies must be called out for what it is—a blatant attempt to continue voter suppression and misinformation tactics that have no place in our constitutional democracy.

#

Resources:

Purple Chair Chat (video discussion), Speech and Its Relationship to Equality: Constitutional Values in the Digital Age, May 28, 2020: https://twitter.com/MyConstitution/status/1266059172266696704 

Speech and Its Relationship to Equality: Constitutional Values in the Digital Age, CAC Issue Brief, David H. Gans, May 21, 2020: https://www.theusconstitution.org/think_tank/issue-brief-speech-and-its-relationship-to-equality-constitutional-values-in-the-digital-age/ 

##

Constitutional Accountability Center is a think tank, public interest law firm, and action center dedicated to fulfilling the progressive promise of the Constitution’s text and history. Visit CAC’s website at www.theusconstitution.org.

###

More from Voting Rights and Democracy

Voting Rights and Democracy
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

Alpha Phi Alpha Fraternity, Inc. v. Secretary, State of Georgia

In Alpha Phi Alpha Fraternity, Inc. v. Secretary, State of Georgia and two consolidated cases, the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit is considering whether the Voting Rights Act’s prohibition on vote...
Voting Rights and Democracy
March 26, 2024

The Airtight Case Against Texas’ Mail-In Voting Age Requirements

Slate
In Texas and a number of other states, voters age 65 and older have the...
By: David H. Gans
Voting Rights and Democracy
Florida Supreme Court

Black Voters Matter Capacity Building Institute v. Byrd

In Black Voters Matter Capacity Building Institute v. Byrd, the Florida Supreme Court is considering whether a congressional map diminishes the voting power of Black Floridians in violation of the Florida Constitution.
Voting Rights and Democracy
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Petteway v. Galveston County

In Petteway v. Galveston County, the Fifth Circuit is determining whether a group of Black and Latino voters can challenge the dilution of their voting power under the Voting Rights Act.
Voting Rights and Democracy
U.S. Supreme Court

Cascino v. Nelson

In Cascino v. Nelson, the Supreme Court is being asked to consider whether a Texas law that only allows voters over age 65 to vote by mail violates the Twenty Sixth Amendment’s prohibition on age-based...
Voting Rights and Democracy
----- District Courts -----

Byrd v. Black Voters Matter Capacity Building Institute

In Byrd v. Black Voters Matter Capacity Building Institute, the Florida District Court of Appeals is considering whether a congressional map diminishes the voting power of Black Floridians in violation of the Florida Constitution.