Voting Rights and Democracy

RELEASE: President Trump’s Online Misinformation A Blatant Attempt To Continue Voter Suppression

WASHINGTON – On news of Twitter marking some of President Trump’s tweets with links to facts about mail-in voting, and the President’s responses to that action, Constitutional Accountability Center President Elizabeth Wydra issued the following reaction:

Balancing the values of free speech, equality, and democracy often requires social media companies to engage in some sort of content moderation and to take action to ensure that lies do not go viral. Twitter’s decision to urge users to get the facts in the face of President Trump’s demonstrable lies about mail-in voter fraud—which has been proven over and over not to be a widespread problem—is not only permissible, it is to be applauded. President Trump’s attempt to bully social media companies into letting him spread lies must be called out for what it is—a blatant attempt to continue voter suppression and misinformation tactics that have no place in our constitutional democracy.

#

Resources:

Purple Chair Chat (video discussion), Speech and Its Relationship to Equality: Constitutional Values in the Digital Age, May 28, 2020: https://twitter.com/MyConstitution/status/1266059172266696704 

Speech and Its Relationship to Equality: Constitutional Values in the Digital Age, CAC Issue Brief, David H. Gans, May 21, 2020: https://www.theusconstitution.org/think_tank/issue-brief-speech-and-its-relationship-to-equality-constitutional-values-in-the-digital-age/ 

##

Constitutional Accountability Center is a think tank, public interest law firm, and action center dedicated to fulfilling the progressive promise of the Constitution’s text and history. Visit CAC’s website at www.theusconstitution.org.

###

More from Voting Rights and Democracy

Voting Rights and Democracy
U.S. Court of Appeals for the First Circuit

California v. Trump

In California v. Trump, the United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit is considering whether President Trump’s executive order on voting is unlawful.
Voting Rights and Democracy
January 9, 2026

Supreme Court Gets New Warning in Pending Case

Newsweek
The Democratic National Committee has filed an amicus brief in the Supreme Court’s upcoming election law...
Voting Rights and Democracy
U.S. Supreme Court

Watson v. Republican National Committee

In Watson v. Republican National Committee, the Supreme Court is considering whether Mississippi may count absentee ballots that are postmarked by Election Day but received up to 5 business days later.
Voting Rights and Democracy
December 9, 2025

CAC Release: Major Campaign Finance Case Tests Court’s Willingness to Respect Congress’s Policy Judgments Aimed at Curbing Harmful Corruption

WASHINGTON, DC – Following oral argument at the Supreme Court this morning in National Republican...
By: Miriam Becker-Cohen, David H. Gans
Voting Rights and Democracy
October 15, 2025

The Supreme Court Is Poised to Rule That It’s Racist to Remedy Racism

Slate
Is it racist to remedy racism? That’s the question at the heart of Callais v. Louisiana,...
Voting Rights and Democracy
October 15, 2025

Supreme Court seems skeptical of key provisions in Voting Rights Act

Medill News Service
WASHINGTON, Oct. 15 (UPI) -- The Supreme Court expressed skepticism Wednesday of a key provision of the Voting...