Voting Rights and Democracy

RELEASE: President Trump’s Online Misinformation A Blatant Attempt To Continue Voter Suppression

WASHINGTON – On news of Twitter marking some of President Trump’s tweets with links to facts about mail-in voting, and the President’s responses to that action, Constitutional Accountability Center President Elizabeth Wydra issued the following reaction:

Balancing the values of free speech, equality, and democracy often requires social media companies to engage in some sort of content moderation and to take action to ensure that lies do not go viral. Twitter’s decision to urge users to get the facts in the face of President Trump’s demonstrable lies about mail-in voter fraud—which has been proven over and over not to be a widespread problem—is not only permissible, it is to be applauded. President Trump’s attempt to bully social media companies into letting him spread lies must be called out for what it is—a blatant attempt to continue voter suppression and misinformation tactics that have no place in our constitutional democracy.

#

Resources:

Purple Chair Chat (video discussion), Speech and Its Relationship to Equality: Constitutional Values in the Digital Age, May 28, 2020: https://twitter.com/MyConstitution/status/1266059172266696704 

Speech and Its Relationship to Equality: Constitutional Values in the Digital Age, CAC Issue Brief, David H. Gans, May 21, 2020: https://www.theusconstitution.org/think_tank/issue-brief-speech-and-its-relationship-to-equality-constitutional-values-in-the-digital-age/ 

##

Constitutional Accountability Center is a think tank, public interest law firm, and action center dedicated to fulfilling the progressive promise of the Constitution’s text and history. Visit CAC’s website at www.theusconstitution.org.

###

More from Voting Rights and Democracy

Voting Rights and Democracy
September 8, 2024

Moore v. Harper, Evasion, and the Ordinary Bounds of Judicial Review

66 Boston L. Rev. (forthcoming 2025)
By: David H. Gans, Brianne J. Gorod, Anna Jessurun
Voting Rights and Democracy
September 5, 2024

“Moore v. Harper, Evasion, and the Ordinary Bounds of Judicial Review”

Election Law Blog
David Gans, Brianne Gorod, and Anna Jessurun have posted this draft on SSRN (forthcoming, Boston College Law Review)....
By: Brianne J. Gorod, David H. Gans, Anna Jessurun, Rick Hasen
Voting Rights and Democracy
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

In re: Georgia Senate Bill 202

In In re: Georgia Senate Bill 202, the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit is considering whether the Materiality Provision in the Civil Rights Act of 1964, which prohibits states from denying...
Voting Rights and Democracy
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Nairne v. Landry

In Nairne v. Landry, the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit is considering whether the Voting Rights Act’s prohibition on vote dilution is a constitutional exercise of Congress’s Fifteenth Amendment enforcement power.
Voting Rights and Democracy
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

United States v. Paxton

In United States v. Paxton, the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit is considering whether the Materiality Provision in the Civil Rights Act of 1964, which prohibits states from denying the right...
Voting Rights and Democracy
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Mi Familia Vota v. Petersen

In Mi Familia Vota v. Petersen, the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit is considering whether requiring voters to include their birthplace on voter registration forms violates the Materiality Provision of the...