ISSUE BRIEF: Speech and Its Relationship to Equality: Constitutional Values in the Digital Age

Understanding the constitutional duty to strike a balance between speech and equality can help inform efforts to address the immensely complicated and difficult problems of platform governance.

Summary

Our Constitution promises both free speech and equality. The First Amendment’s guarantee of freedom of speech ensures the structural role of free speech in a democracy. It safeguards democratic deliberation, protects individual autonomy, and prevents the government from silencing speakers it disagrees with. The Fourteenth Amendment’s guarantee of the equal protection of the laws promises equality under the law for all persons. This means that the government must respect the equality and dignity of every person residing in the United States and may not single out disfavored groups of people for discriminatory treatment. How should we reconcile these two co-equal constitutional values of speech and equality when they come into conflict? All too often, courts privilege speech over equality, pretending there is only a single constitutional value, rather than multiple values, at play. These are pressing issues both in the courts, where conservative activists are insisting that the First Amendment confers a license to discriminate, and outside the courts, where there is a robust debate over what free expression means in the digital age and how and whether to regulate hateful content on social media platforms and how to protect individuals from cyber harassment.
.
Research on constitutional values in a digital era was in part supported by funding from Google.

CAC’s David H. Gans and Praveen Fernandes discuss the issue brief on #PurpleChairChat

More from Civil and Human Rights

Civil and Human Rights
June 20, 2024

RELEASE: Supreme Court decision keeps the door open to accountability for police officers who make false charges

WASHINGTON, DC – Following this morning’s decision at the Supreme Court in Chiaverini v. City...
By: Brian R. Frazelle
Civil and Human Rights
June 11, 2024

The People Who Dismantled Affirmative Action Have a New Strategy to Crush Racial Justice

Slate
Last summer, in Students for Fair Admissions v. Harvard College, the Supreme Court’s conservative supermajority struck...
By: David H. Gans
Civil and Human Rights
April 12, 2024

TV (Gray TV): CAC’s Frazelle Joins Gray TV to Discuss Fourth Amendment Case at Supreme Court

Gray TV Washington News Bureau
Civil and Human Rights
April 22, 2024

RELEASE: Justices grapple with line-drawing but resist overturning important precedent in Eighth Amendment homelessness case

WASHINGTON, DC – Following oral argument at the Supreme Court this morning in City of...
By: Brian R. Frazelle
Civil and Human Rights
April 19, 2024

Will the Supreme Court Uphold the 14th Amendment and Block an Oregon Law Criminalizing Homelessness?

Nearly 38 million Americans live in poverty. In some areas and among some populations, entrenched economic...
By: David H. Gans
Civil and Human Rights
April 18, 2024

DEI critics were hoping that the Supreme Court’s Muldrow decision would undermine corporate diversity programs. It does no such thing

Fortune
The Supreme Court just delivered a big win for workers and workplace equality–but conservatives are...