Voting Rights and Democracy

RELEASE: Supreme Court Rejects Citizenship Question in 5-4 Ruling

CAC President Elizabeth Wydra: “The addition of a citizenship question to the 2020 Census is a discriminatory ploy that undermines the text, history and values of our nation’s founding charter. The Supreme Court was right to keep it off the Census, which is the cornerstone of our democracy.”

WASHINGTON – Today the Supreme Court issued a 5-4 ruling in Department of Commerce v. New York holding that Secretary of Commerce Wilbur Ross had acted pretextually when he sought to add a citizenship question to the 2020 Census.

“The addition of a citizenship question to the 2020 Census is a discriminatory ploy that undermines the text, history and values of our nation’s founding charter,” Constitutional Accountability Center President Elizabeth Wydra said. “The Supreme Court was right to keep it off the Census, which is the cornerstone of our democracy.”

“The Supreme Court properly refused to accept the Trump administration’s lie that the citizenship question was necessary to enforce the Voting Rights Act” CAC Director of the Human Rights, Civil Rights, and Citizenship Program, David Gans said. “Since the passage of the Voting Rights Act, the Census has never asked individuals to report their citizenship status. As the record showed, adding the citizenship question would have drastically slashed minority political representation.”

CAC filed an amicus brief in this case in April 2019. The brief argued that the Constitution requires the federal government to count all people living in the United States. Also, curbing manipulation of the Census by the political branches was one of the main reasons for including the Census Clause in the Constitution.

For more information on CAC’s involvement in this case visit our website.

More from Voting Rights and Democracy

Voting Rights and Democracy
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

Alpha Phi Alpha Fraternity, Inc. v. Secretary, State of Georgia

In Alpha Phi Alpha Fraternity, Inc. v. Secretary, State of Georgia and two consolidated cases, the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit is considering whether the Voting Rights Act’s prohibition on vote...
Voting Rights and Democracy
March 26, 2024

The Airtight Case Against Texas’ Mail-In Voting Age Requirements

Slate
In Texas and a number of other states, voters age 65 and older have the...
By: David H. Gans
Voting Rights and Democracy
Florida Supreme Court

Black Voters Matter Capacity Building Institute v. Byrd

In Black Voters Matter Capacity Building Institute v. Byrd, the Florida Supreme Court is considering whether a congressional map diminishes the voting power of Black Floridians in violation of the Florida Constitution.
Voting Rights and Democracy
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Petteway v. Galveston County

In Petteway v. Galveston County, the Fifth Circuit is determining whether a group of Black and Latino voters can challenge the dilution of their voting power under the Voting Rights Act.
Voting Rights and Democracy
U.S. Supreme Court

Cascino v. Nelson

In Cascino v. Nelson, the Supreme Court is being asked to consider whether a Texas law that only allows voters over age 65 to vote by mail violates the Twenty Sixth Amendment’s prohibition on age-based...
Voting Rights and Democracy
----- District Courts -----

Byrd v. Black Voters Matter Capacity Building Institute

In Byrd v. Black Voters Matter Capacity Building Institute, the Florida District Court of Appeals is considering whether a congressional map diminishes the voting power of Black Floridians in violation of the Florida Constitution.