Voting Rights and Democracy

RELEASE: Thanks to Justice Jackson, Progressive Originalism Emerged at the Supreme Court This Morning: CAC Reacts to Oral Argument in Alabama Redistricting Case

WASHINGTON, DC – Following oral argument at the Supreme Court this morning in Merrill v. Milligan and Merrill v. Caster, cases in which the Court is considering whether Alabama’s 2021 redistricting plan for its congressional districts violates Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act, Constitutional Accountability Center Civil Rights Director David Gans issued the following reaction:

In a defining moment in this morning’s lengthy two-hour long argument, Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson made clear the progressive promise of the Constitution’s text and history as she quickly got to the heart of why Alabama’s defense of its racially gerrymandered districts would turn the Constitution and the Voting Rights Act on its head. Echoing the arguments presented in our amicus brief, Justice Jackson explained that race-consciousness is baked into the Fourteenth and the Fifteenth Amendment’s guarantee of racial equality at the polls.

As she and others also explained, Alabama’s argument that the Voting Rights Act requires maps drawn without regard to race would gut the Voting Rights Act—a statute fundamental to our democracy—and make a statute that takes account of race to ensure equal political opportunities into a shell of its former self. After all, Congress passed the Voting Rights Act to enforce the constitutional guarantee of equal political opportunity, eradicating laws that had the result of leaving voters of color with diminished political opportunities.

As Justice Elena Kagan remarked, the Roberts Court has historically not “treated [the Voting Rights Act] well,” making it harder for communities of color to elect representative of their choice. But as today’s argument makes clear, if the Court follows the text and history of both that statute and the Constitution, it should receive better treatment here.

##

Resources:

Case page in Merrill v. Milligan and Merrill v. Caster: https://www.theusconstitution.org/litigation/merril-v-milligan/ 

David Gans, Race-Consciousness Is Baked Into the Constitution’s Text and History, Oct. 3, 2022: https://www.theusconstitution.org/blog/blog-race-consciousness-is-baked-into-the-constitutions-text-and-history/

##

Constitutional Accountability Center is a nonpartisan think tank and public interest law firm dedicated to fulfilling the progressive promise of the Constitution’s text, history, and values. Visit CAC’s website at www.theusconstitution.org.

###

More from Voting Rights and Democracy

Voting Rights and Democracy
April 29, 2026

CAC Release: Supreme Court’s Conservative Supermajority, Once Again, Guts the Voting Rights Act and Further Enables Racial Discrimination in Voting

WASHINGTON, DC – Following today’s decision at the Supreme Court in Louisiana v. Callais, a...
By: David H. Gans
Voting Rights and Democracy
April 15, 2026

David Gans on the History of the Reconstruction Amendments, and the Connection to Current Supreme Court Cases, including Callais

Election Law Blog
CAC Director of the Human Rights, Civil Rights, and Citizenship Program David Gans' article in Slate about...
Voting Rights and Democracy
March 23, 2026

The Alito Wing of the Supreme Court Sure Sounds Sold on Trump’s Voter Fraud Lies

Slate
CAC Director of the Human Rights, Civil Rights, and Citizenship Program David H. Gans' article...
Voting Rights and Democracy
March 23, 2026

The Supreme Court’s Conspiracy-Brained Justices Are Ready to Limit Mail-In Voting

Balls and Strikes
Balls & Strikes summarized the arguments in Watson v. RNC, linking to CAC's brief. Read more at...
Voting Rights and Democracy
March 21, 2026

Amicus with Dahlia Lithwick: The Roberts Court’s Internal Reckoning

Slate
The Constitutional Accountability Center's brief in Watson v. RNC was discussed on Slate's Amicus podcast. Listen to the full...
Voting Rights and Democracy
March 23, 2026

CAC Release: The Conservative Attack on Voting By Mail Comes to the Supreme Court

WASHINGTON, DC – Following oral argument at the Supreme Court this morning in Watson v....
By: David H. Gans, Simon Chin