Immigration and Citizenship

RELEASE: Win for Migrants at Southwest Border and Presidential Authority in Immigration  

WASHINGTON, DC – Following today’s ruling from the Supreme Court in Biden v. Texas—in which the Constitutional Accountability Center filed a brief on behalf of a bipartisan group of former Department of Homeland Security and Immigration and Naturalization Service officials in support of the Biden Administration—CAC President Elizabeth Wydra issued the following reaction:

This ruling is an important victory for people in immigration proceedings at our southwest border—many of them families and asylum seekers seeking refuge in the United States—and the authority of the president to regulate immigration policy in accordance with the text and history of our nation’s immigration laws.

The Court today was right to recognize that the Biden administration had the authority to rescind the Trump-era MPP policy. As the Court explained, the result it reached today is required by the text of the relevant immigration law and confirmed by the historical context in which it was passed.

Moreover, echoing our brief on behalf of a bipartisan group of former DHS and INS officials, the Court noted that for over two decades “every Presidential administration has interpreted section 1225(b)(2)(C) as purely discretionary.”  Indeed, even though “congressional funding has consistently fallen well short of the amount needed to detain all land-arriving inadmissible aliens at the border, . . . no administration has ever used section 1225(b)(2)(C) to return all such aliens that it could not otherwise detain.”

In reaching this result today, the Court also respected the significant enforcement discretion that Congress has long conferred on the executive branch in the realm of immigration policy. That discretion is critical to the ability of the president to competently manage our nation’s foreign affairs.

#

Resources:

CAC’s case page in Biden v. Texas: https://www.theusconstitution.org/litigation/biden-v-texas/

##

Constitutional Accountability Center is a think tank and public interest law firm dedicated to fulfilling the progressive promise of the Constitution’s text and history. Visit CAC’s website at www.theusconstitution.org.

###

More from Immigration and Citizenship

Immigration and Citizenship
May 19, 2025

Trump Is Tired of Courts Telling Him He’s Breaking the Law

The Atlantic
Beneath the technical arguments at the Supreme Court last week was an effort to take...
Immigration and Citizenship
May 15, 2025

Supreme Court gripe with nationwide injunctions clipped by birthright citizenship case

Courthouse News Service
President Trump’s attempt to stop lower courts from blocking his policies could be upended by...
Immigration and Citizenship
May 14, 2025

Supreme Court to hear oral arguments over birthright citizenship

Roll Call
The Supreme Court justices will give a first glimpse Thursday of how they intend to...
Immigration and Citizenship
May 15, 2025

CAC Release: Supreme Court Argument on Equitable Relief Underscores Importance of the Constitution’s Guarantee of Birthright Citizenship

WASHINGTON, DC – Following oral argument at the Supreme Court this morning in Trump v....
By: Anna Jessurun, Smita Ghosh
Immigration and Citizenship
U.S. Supreme Court

Trump v. CASA, Trump v. Washington, and Trump v. New Jersey

In three cases, the Supreme Court is considering whether to partially stay preliminary injunctions blocking the Trump Administration’s executive order purporting to limit birthright citizenship to children who have at least one parent who is...
Immigration and Citizenship
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

State of Washington v. Trump

In State of Washington v. Trump, the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit is considering whether the Trump Administration’s executive order purporting to limit birthright citizenship to children who have at least...