Immigration and Citizenship

Supreme Court Split Blocks Obama Immigration Plan

By Christine Kim

The Supreme Court has deadlocked over a case regarding President Barack Obama’s immigration plan, it announced on Thursday, blocking the plan from taking effect which would have allowed undocumented immigrants to receive work permits and protected over four million undocumented immigrants from deportation.

The 4-4 split vote was announced with a one-sentence ruling that reads, “The judgment is affirmed by an equally divided court.” The tie vote leaves in place a lower court ruling made in 2015 that ruled against Obama’s executive order.

“This is a ruling that affects millions of American families, but because the Supreme Court does not have its full complement of nine justices, the court was unable to deliver a definitive ruling a case of such national importance.” said president of Constitutional Accountability Center Elizabeth Wydra, referring to Justice Antonin Scalia’s death this past February.

Obama expressed his frustration shortly after the announcement of the ruling.

“It is heartbreaking for the millions of immigrants who’ve made their lives here, who’ve raised families here, who hoped for the opportunity to work, pay taxes, serve in our military, and more fully contribute to this country we all love in an open way,” he said, according to USA Today.

Obama announced his immigration programs via an executive order in 2014. Immediately, a coalition of 26 states, including Texas, blocked the plan on the basis that the president overstepped his power in attempts to bypass Congress.

In 2015, a federal judge blocked the plan from taking effect, siding with the states.

“Today’s decision keeps in place what we have maintained from the very start: One person, even a president, cannot unilaterally change the law,” Texas attorney general Ken Paxton said in a statement following the ruling.

The program, called Deferred Action for Parents of Americans and Lawful Permanent Residents, or DAPA, would have offered protection to parents of children who are U.S. citizens or permanent residents from deportation and provided a renewable work permit for three years.

More from Immigration and Citizenship

Immigration and Citizenship
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Buele Morocho v. Warden Philadelphia FDC

In Buele Morocho v. Warden Philadelphia FDC, the Third Circuit is considering whether the Due Process Clause allows the Trump administration to imprison all undocumented immigrants during deportation proceedings against them.
Immigration and Citizenship
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Sosnava Rodriguez v. Ortega

In Sosnava Rodriguez v. Ortega, the Fifth Circuit is considering whether the Due Process Clause allows the Trump administration to imprison all undocumented immigrants during deportation proceedings against them.
Immigration and Citizenship
April 1, 2026

CAC Release: Justices Skeptical of Administration’s Domicile-Driven Approach to Birthright Citizenship

WASHINGTON, DC – Following oral argument at the Supreme Court this morning in Trump v....
By: Smita Ghosh
Immigration and Citizenship
March 31, 2026

Most Americans Favor Birthright Citizenship. That Wasn’t Always True.

New York Times
Elizabeth Wydra was quoted in the New York Times discussing the history of the Fourteenth Amendment's Citizenship...
Immigration and Citizenship
March 30, 2026

Why the Supreme Court will get the birthright citizenship case right

National Catholic Reporter
Smita Ghosh's Slate article about Lynch v. Clarke and birthright citizenship was cited in an op-ed in the National Catholic...
Immigration and Citizenship
March 21, 2026

Legal History Blog Weekly Roundup

Legal History Blog
CAC Senior Appellate Counsel Smita Ghosh's article in Slate about birthright citizenship was cited in...