Constitutional Accountability Center Constitutional Accountability Center
  • Issues
    • Access to Justice
    • Civil and Human Rights
    • Corporate Accountability
    • Criminal Law
    • Environmental Protection
    • Federal Courts and Nominations
    • Health Care
    • Immigration and Citizenship
    • Rule of Law
    • Voting Rights and Democracy
  • Litigation
  • Think Tank
  • News
    • Blog
    • In the Media
    • Newsletter
    • Press Releases
  • About
    • About CAC
    • Staff
    • Board
    • Careers
    • Contact
  • Issues
    • Access to Justice
    • Civil and Human Rights
    • Corporate Accountability
    • Criminal Law
    • Environmental Protection
    • Federal Courts and Nominations
    • Health Care
    • Immigration and Citizenship
    • Rule of Law
    • Voting Rights and Democracy
  • Litigation
  • Think Tank
  • News
    • Blog
    • In the Media
    • Newsletter
    • Press Releases
  • About
    • About CAC
    • Staff
    • Board
    • Careers
    • Contact
  • Constitutional Progress
    • Arc of Constitutional Progress
    • America’s Second Founding
    • The United States Constitution
  • Experts
  • Get Involved
    • Support Our Work
    • Events
  • Donate
  • Issues
    • Access to Justice
    • Civil and Human Rights
    • Corporate Accountability
    • Criminal Law
    • Environmental Protection
    • Federal Courts and Nominations
    • Health Care
    • Immigration and Citizenship
    • Rule of Law
    • Voting Rights and Democracy
  • Litigation
  • Think Tank
  • News
    • Blog
    • In the Media
    • Newsletter
    • Press Releases
  • About
    • About CAC
    • Staff
    • Board
    • Careers
    • Contact
  • Constitutional Progress
    • Arc of Constitutional Progress
    • America’s Second Founding
    • The United States Constitution
  • Experts
  • Get Involved
    • Support Our Work
    • Events
  • Donate
Voting Rights and Democracy

The Civil War Beginnings of America’s Absentee Ballots

For the first century or so of American independence, people stayed close to home and voted in person at the nearest polling station—much like we do today. As NBC News reports, there were a couple early exceptions to this tradition. In 1775, the town of Hollis, New Hampshire, permitted Continental Army soldiers to send representatives to vote in their stead at a local meeting; and Pennsylvania let soldiers send in their ballots during the War of 1812, though the practice was later declared unconstitutional.

But those scattered instances weren’t enough to make absentee voting a matter of national significance. During the Civil War, however, things changed. If all the Union soldiers stationed away from home couldn’t vote in the presidential election of 1864, it could potentially affect the outcome. Thinking that the majority of those soldiers would support Republican incumbent Abraham Lincoln over Democrat George McClellan, the Republican Party began lobbying for laws allowing far-flung soldiers to cast their ballots from the battlefield.

In 1862, Wisconsin became the first state to pass such legislation, which let military leaders turn their camps into makeshift polling locations and mail soldiers’ ballots to state officials. According to the Constitutional Accountability Center, 19 states had followed suit by the general election of 1864. Some mandated that ballots be collected in camps and sent home en masse, while others, like Minnesota, allowed soldiers to mail in their absentee ballots individually.

Meanwhile, Democrats—worried the soldiers’ votes would hurt McClellan’s chances of winning—warned of voter fraud and tried to block efforts to legalize absentee ballots.

“The soldiers are not asking or demanding any such privilege or right,” wrote F.O. Thorpe, a Democratic senator from Wisconsin, “and in our opinion it is simply a scheme of leading partisans in the dominant party … to gain some great advantage to their party in the future.”

While Wisconsin’s mostly Republican legislature was able to quash Thorpe’s dissent, state legislatures with Democratic majorities, like Illinois’s and Indiana’s, didn’t pass laws allowing soldiers to vote in absentia.

Overall, about 150,000 out of 1 million soldiers (in the Union only; the Confederacy held its own election) were able to vote by mail. Since Lincoln won the popular vote by more than 408,000 votes—and the electoral vote with 212 over McClellan’s paltry 21—it’s unlikely those absentee ballots actually swung the election in his favor, but they did set the precedent for expanded absentee voting laws for wars (and pandemics) in years to come.

Meanwhile, Democrats—worried the soldiers’ votes would hurt McClellan’s chances of winning—warned of voter fraud and tried to block efforts to legalize absentee ballots.

“The soldiers are not asking or demanding any such privilege or right,” wrote F.O. Thorpe, a Democratic senator from Wisconsin, “and in our opinion it is simply a scheme of leading partisans in the dominant party … to gain some great advantage to their party in the future.”

While Wisconsin’s mostly Republican legislature was able to quash Thorpe’s dissent, state legislatures with Democratic majorities, like Illinois’s and Indiana’s, didn’t pass laws allowing soldiers to vote in absentia.

Overall, about 150,000 out of 1 million soldiers (in the Union only; the Confederacy held its own election) were able to vote by mail. Since Lincoln won the popular vote by more than 408,000 votes—and the electoral vote with 212 over McClellan’s paltry 21—it’s unlikely those absentee ballots actually swung the election in his favor, but they did set the precedent for expanded absentee voting laws for wars (and pandemics) in years to come.

 

Get updates on our work

Join CAC's Constitutional Progressives email list for updates on our work!

Authors

  • Becca Damante
  • By Ellen Gutoskey

Quoted

Date Published

September 11, 2020

Publication

Mental Floss

Issue

Voting Rights and Democracy

More from Voting Rights and Democracy

Voting Rights and Democracy
October 15, 2025

The Supreme Court Is Poised to Rule That It’s Racist to Remedy Racism

Slate
Is it racist to remedy racism? That’s the question at the heart of Callais v. Louisiana,...
Voting Rights and Democracy
October 15, 2025

Supreme Court seems skeptical of key provisions in Voting Rights Act

Medill News Service
WASHINGTON, Oct. 15 (UPI) -- The Supreme Court expressed skepticism Wednesday of a key provision of the Voting...
Voting Rights and Democracy
October 15, 2025

Supreme Court looks to neuter key protection for minority voters

Courthouse News Service
A path for equal representation for Black voters in Louisiana appeared distant on Wednesday as...
Voting Rights and Democracy
October 15, 2025

CAC Release: The Continuing Assault on the Voting Rights Act Is Back at the Supreme Court

WASHINGTON, DC – Following oral argument at the Supreme Court this morning in Louisiana v....
By: David H. Gans
Voting Rights and Democracy
October 8, 2025

Republicans Could Draw 19 More House Seats

Political Wire
“Democratic voting rights groups are preparing for a nightmare scenario if the Supreme Court guts...
Voting Rights and Democracy
October 7, 2025

Election Law Blog: “The Supreme Court Is Being Tested on History Once Again”

Election Law Blog
David Gans's article in Slate was featured in Professor Rick Hasen's Election Law Blog.

Newsletter

Join CAC's Constitutional Progressives email list for updates on our work!

Donate

Help CAC continue our work by making a tax-deductible donation.
Donate
Constitutional Accountability Center Constitutional Accountability Center (CAC) is a nonprofit law firm and think tank dedicated to fulfilling the inherently progressive promise of our Constitution’s text, history, and values.
  • Issues
    • Access to Justice
    • Civil and Human Rights
    • Corporate Accountability
    • Criminal Law
    • Environmental Protection
    • Federal Courts and Nominations
    • Health Care
    • Immigration and Citizenship
    • Rule of Law
    • Voting Rights and Democracy
  • About
    • Home
    • Litigation
    • Think Tank
    • News
    • About CAC
    • Our History
    • Staff
    • Board
    • Careers
    • Contact Us
    • Constitutional Progress
    • Experts
    • Blog
    • Events
    • Privacy Policy
© 2025 Constitutional Accountability Center
Designed by Constructive