Environmental Protection

Zinke fingered in Bears Ears corruption probe over uranium mining interests

An energy firm linked to uranium mining interests around Bears Ears National Monument in Utah met with a senior Department of Interior official just one month President Donald Trump issued a surprise request to review the monument’s boundaries. When the review concluded, Trump shrank the monument by 85%. Some 100 uranium claims that were previously *inside* the monument’s protected boundary were suddenly on the outside.

Now, House Natural Resources Committee Chairman Raul M. Grijalva (D-AZ) says Democrats plan hold a hearing on March 13, to look into that shady review.

They sent an invitation to Ryan Zinke, who led the Department of the Interior under Trump at that time and was forced to resign in disgrace over other corruption charges.

Zinke declined the invitation.

Roll Call reports that documents show that Energy Fuels Resources (USA) Inc., a United States subsidiary of a Canadian energy and mining firm, met with a top DOI official who knew he’d be personally involved with such a review, before Trump requested it.

The House Natural Resources Committee wants know if the 2017 reassessment “had a predetermined outcome of shrinking Bears Ears to benefit the uranium sector generally and Energy Fuels Resources specifically.”

From Roll Call:

When President Barack Obama designated the monument in December 2016, its boundaries encompassed or abutted over 350 uranium claims tied to the company. Its uranium processing mill, the only such facility in the United States, was located mere miles from the monument. Proximity to a national monument can lead to additional regulatory scrutiny.

In December 2017, Trump, following recommendations by former Interior Secretary Ryan Zinke that were developed during the review, significantly reduced the size of Bears Ears National Monument and Grand Staircase-Escalante National Monument.

Trump’s revamped boundaries for Bears Ears also likely removed all of more than 100 uranium claims tied to Energy Fuels.

The Natural Resources committee is scheduled to hold its first oversight hearing on the monuments review on March 13, said Adam Sarvana, communications director for Democrats on the panel.

The committee has invited Zinke, who resigned and left in December 2018 amid corruption charges, to attend. It also invited Interior to send a representative. Both declined.

Grijalva told Roll Call that if anyone involved with the review that led to the reduction of Bears Ears’ boundaries met with Energy Fuels before the review commenced, “all my suspicions as to the motivation behind the shrinkage would be validated… I think it would make our need to get at the bottom of it … it would make it even more significant.”

More from Environmental Protection

Environmental Protection
April 23, 2020

RELEASE: Handing Environment a Win, Court Follows Text of Clean Water Act

WASHINGTON – Following the Supreme Court’s ruling in County of Maui v. Hawai‘i Wildlife Fund,...
By: Brianne J. Gorod
Environmental Protection
U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit

American Lung Association v. EPA

In American Lung Association v. EPA, the Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit is considering whether a 2019 Environmental Protection Agency rule, which repealed the 2015 Clean Power Plan, violates the Clean Air...
Environmental Protection
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

League of Conservation Voters v. Trump

In League of Conservation Voters v. Trump, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit is considering whether President Trump may lawfully rescind certain measures put in place by President Obama to protect Alaskan...
Environmental Protection
July 22, 2019

Former EPA Heads, 13 States, Native American Tribe, Beer Brewers, Others Join Supreme Court Clean Water Act Case

Earthjustice
Bipartisan coalition opposes Maui County, Trump administration in case that threatens clean water across U.S.
Environmental Protection
U.S. Supreme Court

County of Maui v. Hawai‘i Wildlife Fund

In County of Maui v. Hawai‘i Wildlife Fund, the Supreme Court considered whether the Clean Water Act requires a permit for the discharge of a pollutant from a point source to navigable waters, even if the pollutant travels...
Environmental Protection
June 17, 2019

Gorsuch, Thomas, and Kavanaugh Clash With Roberts and Alito Over Federal Preemption of State Regulation

Reason
Understanding today’s Supreme Court decision in Virginia Uranium, Inc. v. Warren