The Roberts Court at 10

Roberts’s Environmental Law Record: It’s Not Good, But Don’t Count Him Out | Chapter 6


Many of the snapshots in our yearlong “Roberts at 10” project have concluded that Chief Justice John Roberts has consistently voted for conservative outcomes in significant areas of the law. For much of Robert’s first decade as Chief Justice, his record on environmental law—the topic of this snapshot—followed the same pattern: in every major environmental law case that divided the Supreme Court during Roberts’s first eight years as Chief Justice, Roberts voted against environmental protection, including in the most significant case decided in that period—Massachusetts v. EPA. Roberts’s ninth Term was different, however, as he voted for two significant environmental victories in EPA v. EME Homer City Generation and Utility Air Regulatory Group v. EPA (“UARG”), both cases about Environmental Protection Agency (“EPA”) regulation under the Clean Air Act. Against the backdrop of many votes to limit environmental regulation, there’s only so much one can read into Roberts’s votes in those two cases, but at a minimum, they do suggest that no one should count out Roberts’s vote as the Court prepares to hear Michigan v. EPA, another Clean Air Act case that could affect the EPA’s ability to regulate hazardous air pollutants emitted by electric utilities, later this month.

It’s perhaps not surprising that the story of Roberts’s decisionmaking in environmental law cases is at least somewhat complicated. In the lead-up to his confirmation, Roberts came under significant attack from many members of the environmental community, who feared that his views on federal power were likely to pose an obstacle to robust enforcement of the nation’s environmental laws. Roberts aggressively defended his record on this score, repeatedly noting at his confirmation hearing that, as an attorney, he’d argued cases on both sides of the issue and assuring Senators that he could be counted on to give cases presenting environmental issues a “fair hearing.”

This snapshot will focus on two broad categories of environmental law cases: (1) those that affect the ability of individuals and organizations to sue to prevent or redress environmental harm, and (2) those that affect the ability of governments to regulate pollutants and polluters. Unfortunately, Roberts’s votes in the vast majority of environmental cases that have divided the Court during his tenure thus far have called into question the assurances he gave at his confirmation hearing. Moreover, his more general record on standing suggests little room for optimism on that front, as one of our previous snapshots discusses. But Roberts’s most recent decisions on the second front suggest that while Roberts’s environmental law record thus far has been bad, those who favor strong environmental protections still shouldn’t count him out going forward.


More from Environmental Protection

Environmental Protection
May 25, 2023

RELEASE: Court Rewrites Clean Water Act to Protect Private Land Development at the Expense of…Clean Water

WASHINGTON, DC – Following the Supreme Court’s announcement of its decision in Sackett v. EPA,...
By: Miriam Becker-Cohen
Environmental Protection
January 19, 2023

BLOG: Defending the Environment with Constitutional and Statutory Text and History

This Term, the Supreme Court is considering Sackett v. Environmental Protection Agency, an important environmental...
By: Joie Mills
Environmental Protection
June 30, 2022

U.S. Supreme Court just gave federal agencies a big reason to worry

(Reuters) - The U.S. Supreme Court’s decision on Thursday to block the Environmental Protection Agency from regulating greenhouse gas...
By: Brian R. Frazelle, By Alison Frankel
Environmental Protection
June 30, 2022

RELEASE: Supreme Court’s Conservatives Deal Crushing Blow to Ability of Government to Protect the Environment

“Because of this flawed, ideologically tainted ruling, the power of the national government to solve...
By: Elizabeth B. Wydra
Environmental Protection
U.S. Supreme Court

West Virginia v. Environmental Protection Agency

In West Virginia v. EPA, the Supreme Court considered whether a regulation issued by the EPA to reduce greenhouse gas emissions from power plants was authorized by the Clean Air Act.
Environmental Protection
April 23, 2020

RELEASE: Handing Environment a Win, Court Follows Text of Clean Water Act

WASHINGTON – Following the Supreme Court’s ruling in County of Maui v. Hawai‘i Wildlife Fund,...
By: Brianne J. Gorod