Faulty Federalism
Summary
With the Supreme Court poised to consider the review of marriage equality rulings by lower courts around the country, opponents of marriage equality have radically changed the thrust of their defense of state laws that deny same-sex couples the right to marry. Defenders of discriminatory marriage laws are now pressing a federalism/democracy argument, claiming that the people of a state have the authority to decide whether to place a badge of inferiority on same-sex couples and deny them the right to marry. As documented in this Issue Brief, this argument, which flies in the face of the Constitution’s text and history, is no more viable than prior arguments.
More from Civil and Human Rights
July 18, 2026
Arnie Arnesen Attitude July 16 2026
CAC’s David H. Gans joined The Attitude with Arnie Arnesen to discuss the Reconstruction Amendments. Listen...
U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York
Wridt v. City of New York
In Wridt v. City of New York, the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York is considering whether the NYPD’s mass surveillance system is unconstitutional.
July 8, 2026
Ruling Away From America’s Second Founding
CAC’s David H. Gans wrote about the Roberts Court for Slate magazine. Read more in Slate.
July 1, 2026
Furthering Inclusive Constitutionalism
Professor Allison Brownell Tirres reviewed recent scholarship on the Black Conventions of Reconstruction by CAC’s David H....
June 30, 2026
CAC Release: Roberts Court’s Conservative Supermajority Hollows Out Equal Protection Guarantee
WASHINGTON, DC – Following today’s decision at the Supreme Court in Little v. Hecox and West Virginia...
U.S. Supreme Court
Department of Labor v. Sun Valley Orchards, LLC
In Department of Labor v. Sun Valley Orchards, LLC, the Supreme Court is considering whether the Constitution permits the Department of Labor to use administrative proceedings to impose civil monetary penalties on employers who violate...