Faulty Federalism
Summary
With the Supreme Court poised to consider the review of marriage equality rulings by lower courts around the country, opponents of marriage equality have radically changed the thrust of their defense of state laws that deny same-sex couples the right to marry. Defenders of discriminatory marriage laws are now pressing a federalism/democracy argument, claiming that the people of a state have the authority to decide whether to place a badge of inferiority on same-sex couples and deny them the right to marry. As documented in this Issue Brief, this argument, which flies in the face of the Constitution’s text and history, is no more viable than prior arguments.
More from Civil and Human Rights
April 15, 2026
The Supreme Court Has a Chance to Revolutionize Its Approach to the Law
CAC Director of the Human Rights, Civil Rights, and Citizenship Program David Gans wrote about...
April 9, 2026
April Newsletter: Privacy in the Era of Big Data
March 31, 2026CAC Release: In Chiles, Roberts Court Continues Its Dangerous Distortion of the First Amendment
WASHINGTON, DC – Following today’s decision at the Supreme Court in Chiles v. Salazar, a...
March 18, 2026
David H. Gans joined Arnie Arnesen’s The Attitude podcast
David H. Gans joined Arnie Arnesen's The Attitude podcast to discuss his recent article in Slate magazine about...
March 18, 2026
Gans on Black Conventions and the Reconstruction Amendments
The Legal Theory Blog recommended David H. Gans’s exciting new scholarship on Reconstruction-era Black Conventions. Read an...
March 5, 2026
Gans on Black Conventions during Reconstruction
David Gans, Constitutional Accountability Center, has published Forgotten Framers: Black Conventions and the Second Founding,...