Faulty Federalism
Summary
With the Supreme Court poised to consider the review of marriage equality rulings by lower courts around the country, opponents of marriage equality have radically changed the thrust of their defense of state laws that deny same-sex couples the right to marry. Defenders of discriminatory marriage laws are now pressing a federalism/democracy argument, claiming that the people of a state have the authority to decide whether to place a badge of inferiority on same-sex couples and deny them the right to marry. As documented in this Issue Brief, this argument, which flies in the face of the Constitution’s text and history, is no more viable than prior arguments.
More from Civil and Human Rights
January 13, 2025
CAC RELEASE: At Stanley Oral Argument, Questioning Focuses on Narrow Ground for Resolving Employment Discrimination Case in Favor of a Retiree with a Disability
WASHINGTON, DC – Following oral argument at the Supreme Court this morning in Stanley v....
December 30, 2024
Top Contributor Essays of 2024
The Regulatory Review is pleased to revisit our top regulatory essays of 2024, each authored by...
December 5, 2024
Podcast (We the People): Can Tennessee Ban Medical Transitions for Transgender Minors?
A Tennessee law prohibits transgender minors from receiving gender transition surgery and hormone therapy. Professor Kurt...
December 4, 2024
RELEASE: Supreme Court Should Not Turn Equal Protection Clause on its Head in Case about Medical Care for Transgender Adolescents
WASHINGTON, DC – Following oral argument at the Supreme Court this morning in United States...
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Payan v. Los Angeles Community College District
In Payan v. Los Angeles Community College District, the Ninth Circuit is considering whether lost educational opportunities are compensable under Title II of the Americans with Disabilities Act.
U.S. Supreme Court
Stanley v. City of Sanford
In Stanley v. City of Sanford, the Supreme Court is considering whether the Americans with Disabilities Act protects against disability discrimination with respect to retirement benefits distributed after employment.