Text and History Narratives

“We Do Not Want to be Hunted”: The Right To Be Secure and Our Constitutional Story of Race and Policing


Both Supreme Court doctrine and the scholarly literature on the constitutional constraints on policing generally begin and end with the Fourth Amendment, ignoring the Fourteenth Amendment’s transformative guarantees designed to curtail police abuses and safeguard liberty, personal security, and equality for all regardless of race. This Article corrects this omission by providing the first comprehensive account of the text, history, and original meaning of the Fourteenth Amendment’s limitations on policing. It shows how the Fourteenth Amendment changed our understanding of the constitutional guarantee of the right to be secure from unreasonable searches and seizures and added to our foundational charter a prohibition on all forms of discriminatory policing.

Read the full text of We Do Not Want to be Hunted”: The Right To Be Secure and Our Constitutional Story of Race and Policing below.

Race, Policing, and the Constitution Video Series

“Race, Policing, and the Constitution” is a three-part video series produced by the Constitutional Accountability Center to highlight the constitutional history behind the 4th and 14th Amendments, explicitly including efforts to protect Black Americans from police abuse and violence. 

Inspired by CAC’s latest scholarship, We Do Not Want to be Hunted”: The Right To Be Secure and Our Constitutional Story of Race and Policing, this video series unpacks discriminatory policing and sets the stage for constitutional remedies.

The series features voices from CAC President Elizabeth Wydra and Civil Rights Director David Gans, Raben Group Principal and former Deputy Assistant Attorney General for Legislative Affairs at the Department of Justice Elliot Williams, and Justice Reform Program Director at The Leadership Conference on Civil and Human Rights Sakira Cook.

More from Criminal Justice

Criminal Justice
U.S. Supreme Court

Vega v. Tekoh

In Vega v. Tekoh, the Supreme Court is considering whether police officers who detain and question suspects without providing Miranda warnings can be held accountable when the statements they obtain are used against those suspects...
Criminal Justice
March 6, 2022

Supreme Court considers whether federal police may be sued for excessive force in 2014 case against a Border Patrol agent

CNN — The US Supreme Court is considering a case that could change the broad immunity from...
Criminal Justice
U.S. Supreme Court

Concepcion v. United States

In Concepcion v. United States, the Supreme Court is considering whether a district court must take account of intervening legal and factual developments when exercising its authority to “impose a reduced sentence” under Section 404(b)...
Criminal Justice
October 29, 2021

The Shadow Docket and Police Accountability

The shadow docket strikes again.  This time the Roberts Court has dispensed with its regular...
By: David H. Gans
Criminal Justice
October 5, 2021

Justices grapple with hearsay used to close slain toddler case

Courthouse News Service
WASHINGTON (CN) — The Supreme Court held its cards close to the vest Tuesday as...
By: Smita Ghosh, By Kelsey Reichmann
Criminal Justice
October 6, 2021

Supreme Court Refuses To Hear Case Against State Trooper Who Killed Mentally Ill Man

Ten years ago, a New Jersey state trooper gunned down Willie Gibbons, a mentally ill...
By: David H. Gans, By Phillip Jackson