Reversing Citizens United: Lessons from the Sixteenth Amendment
Summary
Released to coincide with the two-year anniversary of Citizens United, this Issue Brief tells the story of the how progressives in the early 20th Century amended the Constitution to overturn the Supreme Court’s 1895 decision in Pollock v. Farmers’ Loan & Trust, a 5-4 ruling that struck down a federal income tax law and, much like Citizens United, departed from first constitutional principles and a long line of precedents. In telling the story of how the people took the Constitution back from the Lochner-era Supreme Court, the Issue Brief offers critical lessons for modern progressives fighting to reverse Citizens United.
More from Voting Rights and Democracy
U.S. Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
California v. Trump
In California v. Trump, the United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit is considering whether President Trump’s executive order on voting is unlawful.
January 9, 2026
Supreme Court Gets New Warning in Pending Case
The Democratic National Committee has filed an amicus brief in the Supreme Court’s upcoming election law...
U.S. Supreme Court
Watson v. Republican National Committee
In Watson v. Republican National Committee, the Supreme Court is considering whether Mississippi may count absentee ballots that are postmarked by Election Day but received up to 5 business days later.
December 9, 2025
CAC Release: Major Campaign Finance Case Tests Court’s Willingness to Respect Congress’s Policy Judgments Aimed at Curbing Harmful Corruption
WASHINGTON, DC – Following oral argument at the Supreme Court this morning in National Republican...
October 15, 2025
The Supreme Court Is Poised to Rule That It’s Racist to Remedy Racism
Is it racist to remedy racism? That’s the question at the heart of Callais v. Louisiana,...
October 15, 2025
Supreme Court seems skeptical of key provisions in Voting Rights Act
WASHINGTON, Oct. 15 (UPI) -- The Supreme Court expressed skepticism Wednesday of a key provision of the Voting...