Federal Courts and Nominations

Advice & Consent: The Senate’s (Changing) Role in Judicial Confirmations

The NYU Journal of Legislation and Public Policy and the Brennan Center for Justice invite you to a symposium about the changing role of Senate “advice and consent” in the federal judicial nomination process.

Details

Thursday, November 15, 2018
11:30 am
Lipton Hall
D'Agostino Hall
108 West 3rd Street
New York, NY 10012
Brennan Center for Justice and The New York University Journal of Legislation and Public Policy

The NYU Journal of Legislation and Public Policy and the Brennan Center for Justice invite you to a symposium about the changing role of Senate “advice and consent” in the federal judicial nomination process.

Changes in procedural devices, cultural norms, and Senate composition have led to President Trump’s appointment of more appeals court judges (by this point in his term) than any other recent president. They have also led to the extraordinary hearings surrounding the nomination of Judge Brett Kavanaugh to the Supreme Court. The symposium will examine the ways in which the past few years of judicial advice and consent differs from “business as usual,” what advice and consent should mean in the current political and cultural climate, and what institutional changes we might want to see in the Senate going forward.

  • Victoria Bassetti, Fellow, Brennan Center for Justice at NYU School of Law
  • Bob Bauer, Professor of Practice and Distinguished Scholar in Residence, NYU Law School
  • Todd Cox, Director of Policy, NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund, Inc.
  • Praveen Fernandes, Vice President for Public Engagement, Constitutional Accountability Center
  • Jamil Jaffer, Founder, National Security Institute; Adjunct Professor of Law and Director of the National Security Law and Policy Program at the Antonin Scalia Law School at George Mason University
  • Eric Lesh, Executive Director, LGBT Bar Association and Foundation of Greater New York
  • Kristine Lucius, Executive Vice President for Policy, The Leadership Conference
  • Gregg Nunziata, Partner, Manatt, Phelps & Phillips, LLP
  • David Pozen, Professor of Law, Columbia Law School
  • Russell Wheeler, Visiting Fellow, Governance Studies Program, the Brookings Institution; President of the Governance Institute

More from Federal Courts and Nominations

Federal Courts and Nominations
April 3, 2020

RELEASE: CAC Reacts To SCOTUS April Argument Calendar Postponement

“The lower courts — and indeed, workers in various industries across the nation — have...
By: Elizabeth B. Wydra
Federal Courts and Nominations
March 16, 2020

Supreme Court to postpone arguments over coronavirus crisis, a first since 1918

Washington Post
“This postponement should not delay the high court’s resolution of the critical cases currently pending...
By: Elizabeth B. Wydra, By Robert Barnes 
Federal Courts and Nominations
March 16, 2020

RELEASE: High Court Urged To Adapt Its Argument Schedule To Extraordinary Circumstances

“Whether it means holding videoconference or telephonic hearings as other federal courts do, or using...
By: Elizabeth B. Wydra
Federal Courts and Nominations
February 12, 2020

Empirical SCOTUS: About this term: OT 2019

SCOTUSblog/Empirical SCOTUS
“So far, Brianne Gorod of the Constitutional Accountability Center is counsel of record on the...
By: Brianne J. Gorod, By Adam Feldman
Federal Courts and Nominations
January 29, 2020

How the Supreme Court Contributed to Growing Inequality

The American Prospect
“Progressive groups such as the Constitutional Accountability Center have claimed originalism for the left, accusing...
Federal Courts and Nominations
January 16, 2020

EVENT: Are We All Textualists and Originalists Now?

Host: American Constitution Society - Georgetown University Law Center
A discussion with progressive constitutional experts on how prominent textualism and originalism have become in...
Participants: Elizabeth B. Wydra, Victoria Nourse, John Mikhail, Farah Peterson