Corporate Accountability

Trump, Gorsuch, and the Concentration of Economic Power

Details

Monday, March 13, 2017
5:30 pm
Center for American Progress

Throughout his campaign, President Donald Trump railed against concentrated economic power, promising to take on monopolies, banks, and other firms that put their corporate interests ahead of the American people. Yet, Trump has signed executive orders and put forward agency nominees that intend to undo important consumer and regulatory protections and concentrate economic power even further. And in one of his most important first acts as president, Trump nominated conservative Judge Neil Gorsuch to the Supreme Court. A former corporate defense attorney and antitrust expert, Gorsuch, if confirmed, could have a dramatic impact on antitrust law, labor law, and other areas that affect consumers, workers, and the middle class.

On Monday, March 13, the Center for American Progress will explore the concentration of economic power in America, the role that conservative legal philosophy has played in enabling it, and what the Gorsuch nomination means for its future. Sen. Amy Klobuchar (D-MN), a member of the Senate Judiciary Committee and the ranking member of its Subcommittee on Antitrust, Competition Policy, and Consumer Rights, will kick off the event with remarks about the growing concentration of economic power; steps we can take to make antitrust enforcement a more effective tool to address this problem; and the broader economic benefits vigorous enforcement will provide to workers, consumers, and small businesses.

A panel of legal experts will follow with a discussion of the ways the growing wave of concentration—as well as the Trump administration’s changes to the nation’s administrative, civil rights, and other laws—affect the lives of everyday Americans and what the Gorsuch nomination may mean for the future.

Introductory remarks:

  • Winnie Stachelberg, Executive Vice President for External Affairs, Center for American Progress

Opening keynote:

  • Sen. Amy Klobuchar (D-MN)

Featured panelists:

  • Todd A. Cox, Director of Policy, NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund, Inc.
  • Deepak Gupta, Founding Partner, Gupta Wessler
  • Jonathan Kanter, Partner, Antitrust Group, Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison LLP
  • Lillian Salerno, former USDA Deputy Undersecretary for Rural Development
  • Elizabeth Wydra, President, Constitutional Accountability Center

Moderator:

  • Sabeel Rahman, Assistant Professor of Law, Brooklyn Law School

More from Corporate Accountability

Corporate Accountability
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Burgess v. Whang

In Burgess v. Whang, the Fifth Circuit is considering a challenge to the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation’s authority to issue penalties and other supervisory orders. 
Corporate Accountability
October 23, 2024

The Constitution Doesn’t Entitle Drug Manufacturers to a Sweetheart Deal

Washington
Big Pharma is in federal appeals court making the absurd argument that Medicare shouldn’t be...
By: Nina Henry
Corporate Accountability
October 4, 2024

An Oil Giant Railroads Its SCOTUS Connection To Gut Environmental Law

The Lever
A fossil fuel giant with deep ties to Supreme Court Justice Neil Gorsuch, along with...
Corporate Accountability
July 2, 2024

QUICK TAKE: Corporate Interests at the Supreme Court, 2023-2024 Term

Conservative supermajority discards precedent, shifts power to judges, and hobbles agency efforts to enforce the...
By: Brian R. Frazelle
Corporate Accountability
June 24, 2024

The Supreme Court’s War on Working People Just Got a Little Worse

Balls and Strikes
The decision in Starbucks Corporation v. McKinney is part of a long tradition of the Supreme Court...
Corporate Accountability
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Intuit, Inc. v. Federal Trade Commission

In Intuit Inc v. Federal Trade Commission, the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit is considering whether the FTC’s authority to issue cease-and-desist orders against false and misleading advertising is constitutional.