Corporate Accountability

RELEASE: In narrow ruling, Supreme Court rejects baseless effort to shield corporate-derived income from taxation

WASHINGTON, DC – Following this morning’s decision at the Supreme Court in Moore v. United States, a case in which the Court considered a challenge to Congress’s power to tax income under the Sixteenth Amendment, Constitutional Accountability Center Deputy Chief Counsel Brian Frazelle issued the following reaction:

The Sixteenth Amendment overruled a notorious Supreme Court decision that wrongly prevented the government from taxing investment-derived income. Today, the Court avoided repeating its earlier mistake.

The challengers to the tax at issue made aggressive arguments that, if accepted, would have hindered the taxation of income gained through ownership of corporations. In a narrow ruling, the Court rejected that challenge.

As Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson noted in her concurrence, citing the amicus brief we filed on behalf of law professors John R. Brooks and David Gamage, the artificial limit on Congress’s taxing power urged by the challengers “appears nowhere in the text of the Sixteenth Amendment” and runs contrary to the Amendment’s history.

##

Resources:

Case page in Moore v. United States: https://www.theusconstitution.org/litigation/moore-v-united-states/

##

Constitutional Accountability Center is a nonpartisan think tank and public interest law firm dedicated to fulfilling the progressive promise of the Constitution’s text, history, and values. Visit CAC’s website at www.theusconstitution.org.

More from Corporate Accountability

Corporate Accountability
July 26, 2026

CAC Release: Corporations Fare Even Better Than President Trump in the Supreme Court, Constitutional Accountability Center Finds

WASHINGTON, DC – The Supreme Court has just released its final decisions in cases argued...
By: Brian R. Frazelle
Corporate Accountability
U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia

AbbVie v. Department of Health and Human Services

In AbbVie v. Department of Health and Human Services, the United States District Court for the District of Columbia is considering whether the Inflation Reduction Act’s Medicare drug price negotiation program is an unconstitutional taking...
Corporate Accountability
June 5, 2026

US Supreme Court backs federal regulators in wins for FCC and SEC

Reuters
CAC Chief Counsel Brianne Gorod was quoted in Reuters discussing recent Supreme Court wins for...
Corporate Accountability
June 4, 2026

CAC Release: Supreme Court Recognizes the Importance of History in Validating FCC Enforcement Process

WASHINGTON, DC – Following today’s decision at the Supreme Court in Federal Communications Commission v....
By: Smita Ghosh, Joshua Blecher-Cohen
Corporate Accountability
April 24, 2026

How the Supreme Court will have a major impact on the economy this spring

CNN
CAC Chief Counsel Brianne Gorod spoke to CNN about big business at the Supreme Court. Read...
Corporate Accountability
July 26, 2026

CAC Release: Supreme Court Considers Constitutionality of FCC Enforcement Process

WASHINGTON, DC – Following oral argument at the Supreme Court this morning in Federal Communications...
By: Joshua Blecher-Cohen, Smita Ghosh