Corporate Accountability

RELEASE: Supreme Court’s Disappointing Decision in Starbucks Union Case Fails to Account for History

WASHINGTON, DC – Following today’s decision at the Supreme Court in Starbucks Corp. v. McKinney, a case in which the Court considered what standard courts should apply when deciding whether to grant a National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) request for a temporary injunction to halt an alleged unfair labor practice, Constitutional Accountability Center Appellate Counsel Smita Ghosh issued the following reaction:

In a disappointing decision today, the Supreme Court rejected the NLRB’s argument that courts should apply a deferential standard when adjudicating requests for temporary relief during proceedings to determine whether an unfair labor practice has occurred.

The Court’s decision is at odds with the history of American labor law. As our amicus brief made clear, Congress drafted the relevant portion of the National Labor Relations Act to confer limited authority on district courts to grant injunctive relief when the Board convinced them that such relief was appropriate. This history is important because courts’ exercise of equitable discretion must be informed by context—here, as Justice Jackson put it in a partial dissent, the “ignominious history of abuse” that led Congress to restrict the role of federal courts in labor disputes.

The Court’s majority should have respected that history today.

##

Resources:

Case page in Starbucks Corp. v. McKinney: https://www.theusconstitution.org/litigation/starbucks-corp-v-mckinney/

##

More from Corporate Accountability

Corporate Accountability
October 4, 2024

An Oil Giant Railroads Its SCOTUS Connection To Gut Environmental Law

The Lever
A fossil fuel giant with deep ties to Supreme Court Justice Neil Gorsuch, along with...
Corporate Accountability
July 2, 2024

QUICK TAKE: Corporate Interests at the Supreme Court, 2023-2024 Term

Conservative supermajority discards precedent, shifts power to judges, and hobbles agency efforts to enforce the...
By: Brian R. Frazelle
Corporate Accountability
June 24, 2024

The Supreme Court’s War on Working People Just Got a Little Worse

Balls and Strikes
The decision in Starbucks Corporation v. McKinney is part of a long tradition of the Supreme Court...
Corporate Accountability
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Intuit, Inc. v. Federal Trade Commission

In Intuit Inc v. Federal Trade Commission, the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit is considering whether the FTC’s authority to issue cease-and-desist orders against false and misleading advertising is constitutional.
Corporate Accountability
June 20, 2024

RELEASE: In narrow ruling, Supreme Court rejects baseless effort to shield corporate-derived income from taxation

WASHINGTON, DC – Following this morning’s decision at the Supreme Court in Moore v. United...
By: Brian R. Frazelle
Corporate Accountability
May 30, 2024

Supreme Court gives New Yorkers second shot in escrow interest-payment fight

Courthouse News Service
WASHINGTON (CN) — The Supreme Court on Thursday gave New York homeowners another shot at...
By: Smita Ghosh, Kelsey Reichmann