Corporate Accountability

CFPB’s defenders mount legal challenge on agency’s behalf

By Lorraine Woellert

Consumer advocates and congressional Democrats are seeking to mount their own legal defense of the CFPB amid fears that President Donald Trump will weaken the agency or betray it in court.

The Constitutional Accountability Center asked the U.S. Court of Appeals in Washington for permission to intervene in a case on behalf of Senate Banking Committee ranking member Sherrod Brown and House Financial Services Committee ranking member Maxine Waters.

“It has become increasingly clear that movants’ interests may no longer be adequately represented by the new Administration,” the center wrote in its filing, referring to the two Democratic lawmakers. “Thus, movants seek to intervene to defend the constitutionality of the important law they helped enact.”

In a separate filing, Americans for Financial Reform, the Center for Responsible Lending, Self-Help Credit Union, The Leadership Conference on Civil and Human Rights, U.S. Public Interest Research Group and Maeve Elise Brown, chair of the CFPB Consumer Advisory Board, also sought to be heard in the case.

A three-judge panel of the appellate court in October found the bureau constitutionally flawed and gave the White House authority to remove its director at will, giving a lift to Republican efforts to rein in the powerful independent agency.

“The CFPB is unconstitutionally structured,” the court found. “Never before has an independent agency exercising substantial executive authority been headed by just one person.”

That opinion is on hold while the CFPB appeals. The bureau’s allies, fearful that Trump will try to fire CFPB Director Richard Cordray for cause, have launched a political campaign, in addition to the legal effort, to protect the bureau’s independence.

“Any attempt to weaken the CFPB by disrupting its leadership or structure presents a real threat to consumers across the country,” said Michael Calhoun, president of the Center for Responsible Lending. “It will revert us back to lax financial regulations and cause another painful economic crisis that we simply cannot afford.”

The case is PHH Corp. v. CFPB.

More from Corporate Accountability

Corporate Accountability
January 28, 2025

Federal Deposit Insurance as Jarkesy Waiver

Yale Journal on Regulation
An argument lurking just beneath the surface in a pending Fifth Circuit case could stem...
Corporate Accountability
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Boehringer Ingelheim v. Department of Health and Human Services

In Boehringer Ingelheim v. Department of Health and Human Services, the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit is considering whether the Inflation Reduction Act’s Medicare drug price negotiation program is an unconstitutional...
Corporate Accountability
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Ortega v. Office of the Comptroller of the Currency

In Ortega v. Office of the Comptroller of the Currency, the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit is considering a challenge to the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency’s authority to...
Corporate Accountability
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Burgess v. Whang

In Burgess v. Whang, the Fifth Circuit is considering a challenge to the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation’s authority to issue penalties and other supervisory orders. 
Corporate Accountability
October 23, 2024

The Constitution Doesn’t Entitle Drug Manufacturers to a Sweetheart Deal

Washington
Big Pharma is in federal appeals court making the absurd argument that Medicare shouldn’t be...
By: Nina Henry
Corporate Accountability
October 4, 2024

An Oil Giant Railroads Its SCOTUS Connection To Gut Environmental Law

The Lever
A fossil fuel giant with deep ties to Supreme Court Justice Neil Gorsuch, along with...